Lillian Angel wrote:
I added this check to prevent several assertion errors in GdkGraphics.
2006-02-07 Lillian Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* gnu/java/awt/peer/gtk/GtkComponentPeer.java
(handleEvent): Added check. Should not paint or update the
component if it's width and
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 08:47 +, Chris Burdess wrote:
Lillian Angel wrote:
I added this check to prevent several assertion errors in GdkGraphics.
2006-02-07 Lillian Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* gnu/java/awt/peer/gtk/GtkComponentPeer.java
(handleEvent): Added check.
I added this check to prevent several assertion errors in GdkGraphics.
2006-02-07 Lillian Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* gnu/java/awt/peer/gtk/GtkComponentPeer.java
(handleEvent): Added check. Should not paint or update the
component if it's width and height are both 0.
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 17:16 -0500, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 16:36 -0500, Lillian Angel wrote:
This fixes bug #24350. It is rather simple, the ChangeLog explains it
all.
I think these test cases will only pass because of another bug where a
window's position is not
http://www.physto.se/~sven/pr24350.patch
I reverted my patch and applied Sven's patch for this bug. He had
implemented a new function to get the location for a window on the
screen.
2005-11-15 Lillian Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* gnu/java/awt/peer/gtk/GtkComponentPeer.java
Hi Lillian,
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 10:10 -0500, Lillian Angel wrote:
http://www.physto.se/~sven/pr24350.patch
I reverted my patch and applied Sven's patch for this bug. He had
implemented a new function to get the location for a window on the
screen.
2005-11-15 Lillian Angel [EMAIL
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 21:26 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Lillian,
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 10:10 -0500, Lillian Angel wrote:
http://www.physto.se/~sven/pr24350.patch
I reverted my patch and applied Sven's patch for this bug. He had
implemented a new function to get the location for a
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 16:36 -0500, Lillian Angel wrote:
This fixes bug #24350. It is rather simple, the ChangeLog explains it
all.
I think these test cases will only pass because of another bug where a
window's position is not updated when it is moved. There are two
distinct cases here,
