Hi Anthony,
On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 18:50 -0800, Anthony Green wrote:
> > Does it do the right thing if a is NaN and b is not? Or vice versa?
> > If so, this is ok.
>
> Yes, definitely. Although I have what is probably an even simpler patch
> now. I'll commit the following later tomorrow unless
On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 11:12 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Anthony" == Anthony Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Anthony> This patch makes sure FloatBuffer and DoubleBuffer objects compare
> Anthony> properly when they contain NaN values. I've already checked in Mauve
> Anthony> tests case
> "Anthony" == Anthony Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Anthony> This patch makes sure FloatBuffer and DoubleBuffer objects compare
Anthony> properly when they contain NaN values. I've already checked in Mauve
Anthony> tests cases. Ok to commit?
Does it do the right thing if a is NaN and b
This patch makes sure FloatBuffer and DoubleBuffer objects compare
properly when they contain NaN values. I've already checked in Mauve
tests cases. Ok to commit?
AG
2005-12-06 Anthony Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* java/nio/DoubleBuffer.java (compareTo): Handle NaN values within
