> Have you done performance/quality comparisons of your interpolation
> algorithms
> with the reference implementation's? That's probably a good metric for what
> is
> acceptable performance.
When filtering rasters, this implementation is between 75 - 200 times
slower (75 for NN and bicubic,
Francis Kung wrote:
Hello,
The attached patch gets java.awt.image.AffineTransformOp working and
compatible with the reference implementation; mauve tests have also been
committed for this class.
I'm not sure if I have the best interpolation algorithms here
(especially for bicubic) - it works, b
Hello,
The attached patch gets java.awt.image.AffineTransformOp working and
compatible with the reference implementation; mauve tests have also been
committed for this class.
I'm not sure if I have the best interpolation algorithms here
(especially for bicubic) - it works, but it's slow... so if
