Re: [cp-patches] RFC: [Patch] rewrite of classpath/gnu/java/net/protocol/http/*

2005-09-13 Thread Chris Burdess
David Daney wrote: As I threatened last week, I made some major changes to the gnu.java.net.protocol.http package. ... The current version reads the entire body of a HTTP response in to a memory buffer (ByteArrayResponseBodyReader) and if user code needs the content it gets a

Re: [cp-patches] RFC: [Patch] rewrite of classpath/gnu/java/net/protocol/http/*

2005-09-13 Thread Chris Burdess
David Daney wrote: You would probably have a better chance if you threw out all the inetlib classes and started from scratch with a pull-based client. What are you talking about? I am not using inetlib. The gnu.java.net.protocol.http package is the inetlib HTTP client. I do agree with

Re: [cp-patches] RFC: [Patch] rewrite of classpath/gnu/java/net/protocol/http/*

2005-09-13 Thread David Daney
Chris Burdess wrote: David Daney wrote: You would probably have a better chance if you threw out all the inetlib classes and started from scratch with a pull-based client. What are you talking about? I am not using inetlib. The gnu.java.net.protocol.http package is the inetlib HTTP

[cp-patches] RFC: [Patch] rewrite of classpath/gnu/java/net/protocol/http/*

2005-09-12 Thread David Daney
As I threatened last week, I made some major changes to the gnu.java.net.protocol.http package. The patch is probably not in its final form, but I thought I would post it to see what the reaction to it is. At a minimum I would update the copyright dates. The current version reads the entire