On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 20:11 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 16:13 +, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 21:58 +, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
I'd welcome any comments on the attached patch,
which separates the Math native methods into a
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 21:58 +, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
I'd welcome any comments on the attached patch,
which separates the Math native methods into a separate
class, VMMath, so that they can optionally be replaced
by the VM. This fixes PR22198.
I also have code for most of the new
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 16:13 +, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 21:58 +, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
I'd welcome any comments on the attached patch,
which separates the Math native methods into a separate
class, VMMath, so that they can optionally be
Robert Schuster wrote:
Nice work. I think the JNode guys will appreciate this. :)
As do I!
Regards,
Jeroen
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 00:20 +0100, Robert Schuster wrote:
Hi.
Nice work. I think the JNode guys will appreciate this. :)
Yep, Ewout filed the bug.
+package java.lang;
+
+import gnu.classpath.Configuration;
+
+class VMMath
+{
+
+ static
+ {
+if
I'd welcome any comments on the attached patch,
which separates the Math native methods into a separate
class, VMMath, so that they can optionally be replaced
by the VM. This fixes PR22198.
I also have code for most of the new Math methods here
as well. However, I've had some problems in using
Hi.
Nice work. I think the JNode guys will appreciate this. :)
+package java.lang;
+
+import gnu.classpath.Configuration;
+
+class VMMath
+{
+
+ static
+ {
+if (Configuration.INIT_LOAD_LIBRARY)
+ System.loadLibrary(javanet);
+ }
Should this really be javanet?
cya
Robert
