Re: [cp-patches] RFC: Options to javac

2007-05-18 Thread Audrius Meskauskas
I would suggest to add -Xmx512m to the options as well. This would fix the frequently reported problem of the OutOfMemoryError during compilation. The default amount of memory, 64m, seems not sufficient. Audrius.

Re: [cp-patches] RFC: Options to javac

2007-05-10 Thread Christian Thalinger
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 17:00 +0200, Mario Torre wrote: > Il giorno gio, 10/05/2007 alle 13.39 +0100, Chris Burdess ha scritto: > > > Will the switches just be ignored by 1.4 and earlier versions of > > javac, or will they cause an error? I don't think they are ignored. > > Is there configury in

Re: [cp-patches] RFC: Options to javac

2007-05-10 Thread Mario Torre
Il giorno gio, 10/05/2007 alle 13.39 +0100, Chris Burdess ha scritto: > Will the switches just be ignored by 1.4 and earlier versions of > javac, or will they cause an error? My guess was that we were not able to compile without these flags, but it seems to work fine even if I left them out (I

Re: [cp-patches] RFC: Options to javac

2007-05-10 Thread Chris Burdess
Mario Torre wrote: On #classpath a user reported that he had to pass these switch to build the last classpath with javac. I think it can be a good idea to use them by default. What do you think? Will the switches just be ignored by 1.4 and earlier versions of javac, or will they cause an

[cp-patches] RFC: Options to javac

2007-05-10 Thread Mario Torre
On #classpath a user reported that he had to pass these switch to build the last classpath with javac. I think it can be a good idea to use them by default. What do you think? Mario -- Lima Software - http://www.limasoftware.net/ GNU Classpath Developer - http://www.classpath.org/ Jabber: [EMAIL