On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 17:48 -0500, Lillian Angel wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 16:23 -0500, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
>
> > (or just finish it completely :-))
>
> I finished It completely. I ran it with a test case using all the
> possible locations and sizes for the Component and Window. It run
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 17:48 -0500, Lillian Angel wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 16:23 -0500, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
>
> > (or just finish it completely :-))
>
> I finished It completely. I ran it with a test case using all the
> possible locations and sizes for the Component and Window. It run
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 16:23 -0500, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
> (or just finish it completely :-))
I finished It completely. I ran it with a test case using all the
possible locations and sizes for the Component and Window. It runs
exactly like Sun (IBM works slightly different).
2005-11-04 Lill
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 15:37 -0500, Lillian Angel wrote:
> I implemented the missing part of setLocationRelativeTo. It appears to
> work in all the cases I have tested.
>
> Can someone review this before I commit it?
This patch works if the window is smaller than the component and nothing
is offsc
I implemented the missing part of setLocationRelativeTo. It appears to
work in all the cases I have tested.
Can someone review this before I commit it?
Thanks!
2005-11-04 Lillian Angel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* java/awt/Window.java
(setLocationRelativeTo): Implemented case when
