Robert Schuster wrote:
Hi,
Andrew John Hughes schrieb:
2008-06-03 Robert Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java: Functional copy
of gnu/java/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java.
Regards
Robert
Er... fix the binary which is clearly broken by
Hi.
Andrew Haley schrieb:
What is the public equivalent for GetPropertyAction?
There isn't any need, is there?
That depends. :)
It's just a wrapper for
(String) AccessController.doPrivileged(new PrivilegedAction() {
public java.lang.Object run() {
Robert Schuster wrote:
Hi.
Andrew Haley schrieb:
What is the public equivalent for GetPropertyAction?
There isn't any need, is there?
That depends. :)
It's just a wrapper for
(String) AccessController.doPrivileged(new PrivilegedAction() {
public java.lang.Object
2008/6/3 Robert Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
the attached does something very dumb: It makes a copy of an existing
class. Still I need it because otherwise a resulting binary is either
not runnable with classpath or with openjdk's class library.
A better patch would possibly refactor all
Robert Schuster wrote:
Hi,
the attached does something very dumb: It makes a copy of an existing
class. Still I need it because otherwise a resulting binary is either
not runnable with classpath or with openjdk's class library.
A better patch would possibly refactor all classpath code to use
Hi,
the attached does something very dumb: It makes a copy of an existing
class. Still I need it because otherwise a resulting binary is either
not runnable with classpath or with openjdk's class library.
A better patch would possibly refactor all classpath code to use the
sun/security variant
