[cp-patches] RFC: move from gnu.java.security.action.GetPropertyAction to sun.security.action.GetPropertyAction

2008-06-04 Thread Robert Schuster
Hi, the attached patch refactors all of Classpath' code to use sun.security.action.GetPropertyAction instead of gnu.java.security.action.GetPropertyAction. Additionally the class in question is moved to its new package. While I don't like the usage of a non-standard API as much as you I also

Re: [cp-patches] RFC: move from gnu.java.security.action.GetPropertyAction to sun.security.action.GetPropertyAction

2008-06-04 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2008/6/4 Robert Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, the attached patch refactors all of Classpath' code to use sun.security.action.GetPropertyAction instead of gnu.java.security.action.GetPropertyAction. Additionally the class in question is moved to its new package. While I don't like the

Re: [cp-patches] RFC: move from gnu.java.security.action.GetPropertyAction to sun.security.action.GetPropertyAction

2008-06-04 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Robert, On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 10:33 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote: Can we also document each sun.* specific change somewhere? I still regard these as bugs, but not against either GNU Classpath or OpenJDK -- against the specification itself. If code is being relied upon by both class