ranlib .libs/libclasspath.a
creating libclasspath.la
(cd .libs && rm -f libclasspath.la && ln -s ../libclasspath.la libclasspath.la)
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/home/mkoch/src/classpath/build/native/jni/classpath'
Making all in native-lib
make[3]: Entering directory
`/home/mkoch/src/classpath/bu
Hi Michael,
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 05:53 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../native/jni/java-net -I../../../include
> -I../../../../include -I../../../../native/jni/classpath
> -I../../../../native/jni/native-lib -W -Wall -Wmissing-declarations
> -Wwrite-strings -
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 08:16:38AM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 05:53 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../native/jni/java-net
> > -I../../../include -I../../../../include -I../../../../native/jni/classpath
> > -I../../../..
> "Michael" == Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> The question is now: Do we want to support glibc (and
Michael> probably other libc's for embedded targets) that lack this
Michael> method? Perhaps we can just throw some exception on these
Michael> systems.
Yeah. Try this patch
