Hi,
S-CSCF and P-CSCF nodes are inserting the Record-Route header with hostname (as
shown below), which is difficult to resolve at soft-client; will it be possible
to replace the hostname to IP address ?
SIP/2.0 200 OK
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Call-ID: udy3vSoVmpBZvUhhjPMfOg..
From: ;tag=056a893a
To: ;t
Hi,
We would like to change the Ellis provisioning portal listening port number
from 80 to 8080, please suggest how to change ?
Thanks
Aravind
___
Clearwater mailing list
Clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org
http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailma
Hi,
We would like to insert 'Back-to-Back Registration Agent' component between the
P-CSCF and I-CSCF, How do we configure the P-CSCF to route the traffic to our
Back-to-Back Registration Agent ?
Thanks
Aravind
___
Clearwater mailing list
Clearwater@
Hi,
How do we disable the S-CSCF Forking functionality ? more than one UE are
registered to IMS-Core network with same IMPI and IMPU, S-CSCF try to fork the
all registered UE for the MT call landing on this IMPU.
Thanks
Aravind
___
Clearwater mailin
Hi Andrew,
How do we disable the S-CSCF Forking functionality ? more than one UE are
registered to IMS-Core network with same IMPI and IMPU, S-CSCF try to fork the
all registered UE for the MT call landing on this IMPU.
Thanks
Aravind
___
Clearwater
Hi,
All-in-one Images setup supports I-CSCF functionality ?
Trying to REGISTER the X-Lite UE to clearwater (clearwater-infrastructure
1.0-160518.173307) IMS network, registration fails with error response -404.
After analyzing the sprout logs I-CSCF is not involved in the REGISTER path,
inst
Hi,
Trying to REGISTER the X-Lite UE to clearwater (clearwater-infrastructure
1.0-160518.173307) IMS network, registration fails with error response -404.
After analyzing the sprout logs I-CSCF is not involved in the REGISTER path,
instead the REGISTER message delivered directly to S-CSCF. Ho
Hi,
We are testing the Communication Diversion scenario with MRF announcement,
observed that the Announcement INVITE request initiated from the Application
Server (TAS) is bouncing back. Do we need to configure the S-CSCF to forward
the request to MRF ?
The expected Header in the Announcement
Hi,
We are testing project clear water (clearwater-infrastructure
1.0-160518.173307) , we observed that IMS core network registration expiry time
is always 300 sec; it's not considering the Expiry timer in the successful
Registration message. Any configuration to set the Registration Expiry ti
re seeing the Privacy options being modified by
Clearwater?
Richard
From: Clearwater [mailto:clearwater-boun...@lists.projectclearwater.org] On
Behalf Of Shirabur, Aravind Ashok (CMS)
Sent: 22 August 2016 08:09
To:
Clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org<mailto:Clearwater@lists.projectclearw
Hi,
We are testing project clear water (clearwater-infrastructure
1.0-160518.173307) , we find that "," is used as delimiter for separating
multiple values of the Privacy header (example: "Privacy: id, user, history").
As per RFC-3323 (https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3323.txt) privacy header value
11 matches
Mail list logo