On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 01:14:45 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>> Anto J has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
>> since the last revision:
>>
>> 8296934: Write a test to verify whether Undecorated Frame can be iconified
>> or not
>
> test/jdk/java/awt/Frame/Iconify/I
On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 04:41:15 GMT, Ravi Gupta wrote:
>> This testcase verifies the following assertions
>>
>> a. Selecting an item in the Choice using mouse generates ItemEvent.
>> b. Single-click on an Checkbox generates ItemEvent.
>>
>> Testing:
>> Tested using Mach5(20 times per platform) in m
On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 16:35:24 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
> The serialized form of the following classes in JDK 7 builds are not
> compatible with prior versions of Java:
> javax.swing.text.html.parser.ParserDelegator
> javax.swing.LayoutComparator
> They need to be declared as not com
On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 08:19:41 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
> Couple of local variables in
> `com.apple.laf.AquaFileSystemModel.FilesLoader#run` are used only within the
> method from single thread. So we can avoid usage of legacy synchronized
> `Vector` here and use `ArrayList` instead.
This pul
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 19:59:38 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> The `ScaledEtchedBorderTest.java` test
> ([JDK-8279614](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8279614)) verifies that
> the thickness of lines of `EtchedBorder` is consistent. The component inside
> had the same background color as the fram
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 10:01:02 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
> Please review this patch that removes unnecessary exports from awt.dll.
>
> The exports were introduced in e4c9db984fe1a3a9d06fb60e333e92df3b165454, and
> as far as I could tell, they were never used; the exported functions are only
>
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 19:59:38 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> The `ScaledEtchedBorderTest.java` test
> ([JDK-8279614](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8279614)) verifies that
> the thickness of lines of `EtchedBorder` is consistent. The component inside
> had the same background color as the fram
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 20:28:55 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> Don't you need to close the
> [JDK-8294921](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8294921) since it was fixed
> already?
This issue has been closed now.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11836
On Thu, 29 Dec 2022 06:52:17 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>> The serialized form of the following classes in JDK 7 builds are not
>> compatible with prior versions of Java:
>> javax.swing.text.html.parser.ParserDelegator
>> javax.swing.LayoutComparator
>> They need to be declared as n
On Thu, 29 Dec 2022 06:52:17 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>> The serialized form of the following classes in JDK 7 builds are not
>> compatible with prior versions of Java:
>> javax.swing.text.html.parser.ParserDelegator
>> javax.swing.LayoutComparator
>> They need to be declared as n
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 19:59:38 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> The `ScaledEtchedBorderTest.java` test
> ([JDK-8279614](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8279614)) verifies that
> the thickness of lines of `EtchedBorder` is consistent. The component inside
> had the same background color as the fram
The `ScaledEtchedBorderTest.java` test
([JDK-8279614](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8279614)) verifies that the
thickness of lines of `EtchedBorder` is consistent. The component inside had
the same background color as the frame. Yet if there's another component the
background of which is
> On Jan 3, 2023, at 1:10 PM, Philip Race wrote:
>
>
>
>> FX list as well as that it would be nice if SceneBuilder did have an ‘about’
>> menu item to check the version you have installed.
>
> For FX apps .. you really should be asking on the FX list.
> Most of the above - actually I suspec
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 10:57:15 GMT, Alexander Scherbatiy
wrote:
>> **Environment**:
>> GraalVM 22.3.0 with jdk 19, Windows OS.
>>
>> **Description**:
>> Create a native image of Swing application using GraalVM and run it with `
>> -Dsun.awt.fontconfig=fontconfig.properties.src` java property.
PS actually java launcher code still reads -Dapple.awt.application.name
-phil.
On 1/3/23 11:10 AM, Philip Race wrote:
On 12/28/22 7:11 AM, Michael Hall wrote:
I was wondering for some reason what version of the Scene Builder
application I had. There was no application “About” menu item.
I no
On 12/28/22 7:11 AM, Michael Hall wrote:
I was wondering for some reason what version of the Scene Builder application I
had. There was no application “About” menu item.
I noticed one of my own applications did have this but I didn’t remember how.
I finally noticed on my jpackage options I wa
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 14:17:42 GMT, Manukumar V S wrote:
> java/awt/PopupMenu/PopupMenuLocation.java seems to be unstable in MacOS
> machines, especially in MacOSX 12 & 13 machines. It seems to be a testbug as
> adding some stability improvements fixes the issue. It intermittently fails
> in CI
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 01:07:11 GMT, Damon Nguyen wrote:
>> java/awt/PopupMenu/PopupMenuLocation.java seems to be unstable in MacOS
>> machines, especially in MacOSX 12 & 13 machines. It seems to be a testbug as
>> adding some stability improvements fixes the issue. It intermittently fails
>> in
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 14:17:42 GMT, Manukumar V S wrote:
> java/awt/PopupMenu/PopupMenuLocation.java seems to be unstable in MacOS
> machines, especially in MacOSX 12 & 13 machines. It seems to be a testbug as
> adding some stability improvements fixes the issue. It intermittently fails
> in CI
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 07:39:27 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>> Label.foreground UIProperty is not honored by Nimbus L&F. It needs to be
>> Label[Enabled].textForeground which is the corresponding Synth property
>> Added support for setting JLabel foreground color for Nimbus L&F
>
> Prasanta Sadh
On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 07:20:43 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> Small cleanup, unnecessary semicolons are deleted here and there.
I see that this PR touches only java files.
A few native files have these type of typos as well. I think, it is worth
cleaning them as well.
-
PR: https://gi
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 09:05:54 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>> Any idea why "Open" button is not shown whereas "Cancel" button is shown?
>> Seems to be some product issue w.r.t button size for "Open" button...
>
>> @prsadhuk the size issue isn't affecting anything since it is disabled
>> inside
> This test case verifies that Undecorated Frame can be iconified or not
> Using mouse click events generated WINDOW_ACTIVATED, WINDOW_ICONIFIED,
> WINDOW_DEACTIVATED, and WINDOW_DEICONIFIED and tested whether it is iconified
> or not.
Anto J has updated the pull request incrementally with one a
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 08:28:16 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>> When JFilechooser is added to a frame, the control buttons are disabled.
>> Since in the test the control buttons are not required since JFilechooser is
>> added to a JFrame and in turn frame disposal is handled by PassFailJFrame.
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 08:28:16 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>> When JFilechooser is added to a frame, the control buttons are disabled.
>> Since in the test the control buttons are not required since JFilechooser is
>> added to a JFrame and in turn frame disposal is handled by PassFailJFrame.
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 08:28:16 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
> Any idea why "Open" button is not shown whereas "Cancel" button is shown?
> Seems to be some product issue w.r.t button size for "Open" button...
Didn't analyse it yet. Thought of handling that as a separate issue. Since in
this tes
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 07:08:13 GMT, Tejesh R wrote:
> When JFilechooser is added to a frame, the control buttons are disabled.
> Since in the test the control buttons are not required since JFilechooser is
> added to a JFrame and in turn frame disposal is handled by PassFailJFrame.
> The fix is t
27 matches
Mail list logo
