On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 13:04:26 GMT, Tejesh R wrote:
> This is happening in linux where `BuffereStrategyPaintManager` is used to
> paint to offscreen. Here `bsg` bufferStrategy SunGraphics2D is used to paint
> to offscreen where the background is not refreshed, which does only clipping
> and then
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 04:27:13 GMT, Tejesh R wrote:
>> That code was added by me to implement the shaped windows on macOS, that is
>> the only platform we support the translucent backbuffer in RepaintManager.
>> For the translucent backbuffer and even opaque component it is necessary to
>> clear
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 21:01:11 GMT, Alisen Chung wrote:
>> Root cause of the test failure was fixed with
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8316931, updating this test since the
>> other fix also included a test update.
>
> Alisen Chung has updated the pull request incrementally with one addi
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 07:21:18 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>> This how it is done in
>> [RepaintManager](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/69a11c7f7ea7c4195a8ee56391bdf04c75bd8156/src/java.desktop/share/classes/javax/swing/RepaintManager.java#L1711),
>> it uses background color of the componen
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 21:01:11 GMT, Alisen Chung wrote:
>> Root cause of the test failure was fixed with
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8316931, updating this test since the
>> other fix also included a test update.
>
> Alisen Chung has updated the pull request incrementally with one addi
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 18:09:15 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> This PR proposes to remove the use of `Unsafe` in the class
>> `XEmbeddingContainer ` and replace it with the supported FFM API.
>>
>> I tried to make this PR as small as possible while opening up for migration
>> of other classes later o
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 01:55:57 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> > Embedded frames are for applets (dead) and JAWT and SWT. I don't see how
> > any of those could use this.
>
> yeah, I meant jawt, not eawt. SWT used some of the code directly from the
> native code, so they bypassed private access an
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 01:23:34 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
> Embedded frames are for applets (dead) and JAWT and SWT. I don't see how any
> of those could use this.
yeah, I meant jawt, not eawt. SWT used some of the code directly from the
native code, so they bypassed private access and modules. Might
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:45:08 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> > Anyone have ANY idea where or how this might be used ? I'd like to be sure
> > before I propose that.
>
> When the eawt was enhanced to support embedded frames all related
> non-public/internal code was not deleted - it was found tha
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 22:46:58 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>Anyone have ANY idea where or how this might be used ? I'd like to be sure
>before I propose that.
When the eawt was enhanced to support embedded frames all related
non-public/internal code was not deleted - it was found that people used that
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 18:09:15 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> This PR proposes to remove the use of `Unsafe` in the class
>> `XEmbeddingContainer ` and replace it with the supported FFM API.
>>
>> I tried to make this PR as small as possible while opening up for migration
>> of other classes later o
> Root cause of the test failure was fixed with
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8316931, updating this test since the
> other fix also included a test update.
Alisen Chung has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
update test strings
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 13:22:48 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
> This enhancement adds three methods to `PassFailJFrame.Builder`:
>
> 1. **`splitUIRight`** to display test UI to the right of the instructions;
> 2. **`splitUIBottom`** to display test UI to the bottom of the instructions;
> 3. `splitUI`:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:34:46 GMT, Tejesh R wrote:
>> Yes, we can. There's `@key printer` which implies the test is to be run on a
>> system where at least one printer is available.
>>
>> What do you suggest actually?
>
> I am thinking whether the printer availability check is required at
> Ins
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:11:14 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/awt/print/PrinterJob/PrintLatinCJKTest.java line 53:
>>
>>> 51:
>>> 52: private static final String INFO = """
>>> 53: You need a printer for this test. If you have none, let
>>
>> Can we use `PrinterJob.lo
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 06:56:06 GMT, Tejesh R wrote:
>> Alexey Ivanov has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains six commits:
>>
>> - Merge 8294148-splitUI
>> - Revert the condition in print()
>> - Update copyright year
>> -
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 19:16:45 GMT, Abhishek Kumar wrote:
> @mrserb [JDK-8298153](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8298153) issue
> raised by you for JCheckBox and JRadioButton has similar issue with JLabel.
> The proposed fix here resolves the issue for JLabel and similar approach is
> appli
> JLabel text is not painted with the LAF defined foreground color in GTK LAF.
> In GTK LAF the foreground color is retrieved by using native system APIs. Fix
> is to return the foreground color if it is set by LAF defined property
> otherwise return the default color by calling native APIs.
> A
18 matches
Mail list logo
