> This brings the CPU24_07 changes into jdk23 branch.
Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in
by the merge/rebase.
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/p
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 05:33:15 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> This brings in CPU24_07 changes into master branch
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: d90c20c0
Author:Jaikiran Pai
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/d90c20c0c728ced94493e0e58956153f6f61f898
Stats: 1
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 05:33:54 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> This brings the CPU24_07 changes into jdk23 branch.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 7afb958e
Author:Jaikiran Pai
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/7afb958e8d30221456a7b4634de0200dfe074950
Stats:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 05:33:15 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> This brings in CPU24_07 changes into master branch
Thank you David and Daniel for the reviews.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20211#issuecomment-2232494499
> This brings in CPU24_07 changes into master branch
Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in
by the merge/rebase.
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pu
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 05:33:54 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> This brings the CPU24_07 changes into jdk23 branch.
Hotspot looks good. Thanks
-
Marked as reviewed by dholmes (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20212#pullrequestreview-2181941981
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 05:33:15 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> This brings in CPU24_07 changes into master branch
Hotspot looks good.
Thanks
-
Marked as reviewed by dholmes (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20211#pullrequestreview-2181940719
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 05:33:54 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> This brings the CPU24_07 changes into jdk23 branch.
Marked as reviewed by djelinski (Reviewer).
-
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20212#pullrequestreview-2181924794
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 05:33:15 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> This brings in CPU24_07 changes into master branch
Marked as reviewed by djelinski (Reviewer).
-
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20211#pullrequestreview-2181924404
This brings in CPU24_07 changes into master branch
-
Commit messages:
- 8323390: Enhance mask blit functionality
- 8320097: Improve Image transformations
- 8327413: Enhance compilation efficiency
- 8324559: Improve 2D image handling
- 8325600: Better symbol storage
- 8319859: Be
This brings the CPU24_07 changes into jdk23 branch.
-
Commit messages:
- 8323390: Enhance mask blit functionality
- 8320097: Improve Image transformations
- 8327413: Enhance compilation efficiency
- 8324559: Improve 2D image handling
- 8325600: Better symbol storage
- 8319859: B
On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:59:20 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
>> snprintf has been available for all officially and unofficially supported
>> compilers for Windows, Visual Studio since version 2015 and gcc since, well,
>> forever. snprintf is conforming to C99 since the start when compiling using
>>
On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 19:49:39 GMT, Damon Nguyen wrote:
> Are there no repercussions to setting this boolean to `TRUE` across the board
> for one test to pass?
I guess my question is, why was it explicitly set to FALSE before and now we
set it to TRUE?
Why was it set to `FALSE` before is unclea
On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 23:29:25 GMT, Harshitha Onkar wrote:
> Typedef re-declaration warnings were seen on Solaris in 11u but this seems to
> be an issue in all releases including mainline, but only the Solaris compiler
> warns.
>
> Two typedef declarations are causing this issue - `GMainContex
On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 05:56:17 GMT, Abhishek Kumar wrote:
> This test was modified under
> [JDK-8328403](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8328403) bug to remove the
> applet usage. Test modification includes the instruction change as well which
> says that `Check that there is a panel with "T
On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 06:13:15 GMT, Abhishek Kumar wrote:
> Issue is due to the condition added for the opaque property of
> SynthTabbedPane in
> [JDK-8226990](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8226990). The previous fix
> for GTK and Nimbus was handled commonly in `SynthTabbedPaneUI` class to
On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 23:29:25 GMT, Harshitha Onkar wrote:
> Typedef re-declaration warnings were seen on Solaris in 11u but this seems to
> be an issue in all releases including mainline, but only the Solaris compiler
> warns.
>
> Two typedef declarations are causing this issue - `GMainContex
On 7/15/24 5:11 PM, Daniel Gredler wrote:
Hi Phil,
Thank you for the response and the insights!
I have to admit I don't know much about the situation in macOS, but I
assume they're moving things in a direction that works best for their
particular situation (complete control over both the so
On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 23:29:25 GMT, Harshitha Onkar wrote:
> Typedef re-declaration warnings were seen on Solaris in 11u but this seems to
> be an issue in all releases including mainline, but only the Solaris compiler
> warns.
>
> Two typedef declarations are causing this issue - `GMainContex
On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:59:20 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
>> snprintf has been available for all officially and unofficially supported
>> compilers for Windows, Visual Studio since version 2015 and gcc since, well,
>> forever. snprintf is conforming to C99 since the start when compiling using
>>
On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:52:01 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
>> src/jdk.jdwp.agent/windows/native/libjdwp/util_md.h line 32:
>>
>>> 30: #include /* for _MAx_PATH */
>>> 31:
>>> 32: typedef unsigned long long UNSIGNED_JLONG;
>>
>> This change has nothing to do with _sprintf. Not sure why it's
On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:59:20 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
>> snprintf has been available for all officially and unofficially supported
>> compilers for Windows, Visual Studio since version 2015 and gcc since, well,
>> forever. snprintf is conforming to C99 since the start when compiling using
>>
> snprintf has been available for all officially and unofficially supported
> compilers for Windows, Visual Studio since version 2015 and gcc since, well,
> forever. snprintf is conforming to C99 since the start when compiling using
> gcc, and 2015 when using Visual Studio. Since it conforms to
On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 16:30:02 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> Julian Waters has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> USe os::snprintf in HotSpot
>
> src/jdk.jdwp.agent/windows/native/libjdwp/util_md.h line 32:
>
>> 30: #include /
24 matches
Mail list logo
