On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:54:56 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:
>> Please review this fix for JDK-6355567, which updates AdobeMarkerSegment to
>> use the reported length of the segment instead of assuming it's always
>> exactly 14 bytes.
>
> Liam Miller-Cushon has updated the pull request increment
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:54:56 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:
>> Please review this fix for JDK-6355567, which updates AdobeMarkerSegment to
>> use the reported length of the segment instead of assuming it's always
>> exactly 14 bytes.
>
> Liam Miller-Cushon has updated the pull request increment
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 07:24:36 GMT, Jeremy wrote:
> Does anyone want to reinstate a test for this? I created a simple 10x10 black
> jpeg that reproduces the problem:
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/15rhf9-aMqajgoc3OKFhJq92hIu4OmG32/view?usp=sharing
Thanks! I have reinstated the test with tha
> Please review this fix for JDK-6355567, which updates AdobeMarkerSegment to
> use the reported length of the segment instead of assuming it's always
> exactly 14 bytes.
Liam Miller-Cushon has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
Restore
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 23:51:11 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:
>> Please review this fix for JDK-6355567, which updates AdobeMarkerSegment to
>> use the reported length of the segment instead of assuming it's always
>> exactly 14 bytes.
>
> Liam Miller-Cushon has updated the pull request with a new
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 23:51:11 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:
>> Please review this fix for JDK-6355567, which updates AdobeMarkerSegment to
>> use the reported length of the segment instead of assuming it's always
>> exactly 14 bytes.
>
> Liam Miller-Cushon has updated the pull request with a new
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 23:51:11 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:
>> Please review this fix for JDK-6355567, which updates AdobeMarkerSegment to
>> use the reported length of the segment instead of assuming it's always
>> exactly 14 bytes.
>
> Liam Miller-Cushon has updated the pull request with a new
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 23:19:39 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:
> Please review this fix for JDK-6355567, which updates AdobeMarkerSegment to
> use the reported length of the segment instead of assuming it's always
> exactly 14 bytes.
Thanks, I have removed the test
-
PR Comment: http
> Please review this fix for JDK-6355567, which updates AdobeMarkerSegment to
> use the reported length of the segment instead of assuming it's always
> exactly 14 bytes.
Liam Miller-Cushon has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The pull request now cont
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 23:19:39 GMT, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:
> Please review this fix for JDK-6355567, which updates AdobeMarkerSegment to
> use the reported length of the segment instead of assuming it's always
> exactly 14 bytes.
The provided image for the test looks to me like a down-sized ve
Please review this fix for JDK-6355567, which updates AdobeMarkerSegment to use
the reported length of the segment instead of assuming it's always exactly 14
bytes.
-
Commit messages:
- 6355567: AdobeMarkerSegment causes failure to read valid JPEG
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/
11 matches
Mail list logo
