On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 06:02:10 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
> guess you can do "\integrate" for us to "sponsor"
Or rather, @vtstydev, issue the
[`/integrate`](https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/SKARA/Pull+Request+Commands#PullRequestCommands-/integrate)
command to integrate the fix. Someone wil
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 09:47:25 GMT, vtstydev wrote:
>>> > Revert the changes to the test which limit the pages printed out.
>>> > The test MUST print all orientations and MUST always print both opaque
>>> > and alpha
>>> > 95% of the point of this test is to ensure consistency across all cases
>>>
On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 03:21:44 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> vtstydev has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Remove trailing whitespace
>> - Done requested fixes 2
>
>> > Revert the changes to the test which limit the pages printed o
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 11:32:17 GMT, vtstydev wrote:
>> More correct way to take in consideration nonzero PHYSICALOFFSETX,
>> PHYSICALOFFSETY of device for banded-raster printing loop. Only on Windows
>> platform under certain conditions real device prints shifted image on paper.
>
> vtstydev has u
On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 13:34:47 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
> Revert the changes to the test which limit the pages printed out.
> The test MUST print all orientations and MUST always print both opaque and
> alpha
> 95% of the point of this test is to ensure consistency across all cases and
> if it doesn'
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 11:32:17 GMT, vtstydev wrote:
>> More correct way to take in consideration nonzero PHYSICALOFFSETX,
>> PHYSICALOFFSETY of device for banded-raster printing loop. Only on Windows
>> platform under certain conditions real device prints shifted image on paper.
>
> vtstydev has u
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 11:32:17 GMT, vtstydev wrote:
>> More correct way to take in consideration nonzero PHYSICALOFFSETX,
>> PHYSICALOFFSETY of device for banded-raster printing loop. Only on Windows
>> platform under certain conditions real device prints shifted image on paper.
>
> vtstydev has u
> More correct way to take in consideration nonzero PHYSICALOFFSETX,
> PHYSICALOFFSETY of device for banded-raster printing loop. Only on Windows
> platform under certain conditions real device prints shifted image on paper.
vtstydev has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
