On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:34:12 GMT, Christopher Sahnwaldt
wrote:
>> In
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/b8af3d50192f8bc98d83f8102f0fd1989f302e32
>> the weak reference was accidentally changed from a field to a local
>> variable, which means that the PropertyChangeListener keeps a strong
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:34:12 GMT, Christopher Sahnwaldt
wrote:
>> In
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/b8af3d50192f8bc98d83f8102f0fd1989f302e32
>> the weak reference was accidentally changed from a field to a local
>> variable, which means that the PropertyChangeListener keeps a strong
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:34:12 GMT, Christopher Sahnwaldt
wrote:
>> In
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/b8af3d50192f8bc98d83f8102f0fd1989f302e32
>> the weak reference was accidentally changed from a field to a local
>> variable, which means that the PropertyChangeListener keeps a strong
> In
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/b8af3d50192f8bc98d83f8102f0fd1989f302e32
> the weak reference was accidentally changed from a field to a local
> variable, which means that the PropertyChangeListener keeps a strong
> reference to executorService, which is a resource leak
Christophe