On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 09:03:08 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
> Seems like the image files are being used in xml file and not in java where
> probably we could have used some bufferedimage.. png headers doesn't show any
> copyright as far I could see but still not sure if those images can be
> o
On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 06:13:15 GMT, Abhishek Kumar wrote:
> Issue is due to the condition added for the opaque property of
> SynthTabbedPane in
> [JDK-8226990](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8226990). The previous fix
> for GTK and Nimbus was handled commonly in `SynthTabbedPaneUI` class to
On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 08:35:50 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>> Issue is due to the condition added for the opaque property of
>> SynthTabbedPane in
>> [JDK-8226990](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8226990). The previous fix
>> for GTK and Nimbus was handled commonly in `SynthTabbedPaneUI`
On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 08:35:50 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
> Is it not possible to opensource the test along with this fix? This bugid
> needs to be added in the tag..
There are few png images associated with the test and most probably it can be
open sourced but I am not sure.
> This bugid n
On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 06:13:15 GMT, Abhishek Kumar wrote:
> Issue is due to the condition added for the opaque property of
> SynthTabbedPane in
> [JDK-8226990](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8226990). The previous fix
> for GTK and Nimbus was handled commonly in `SynthTabbedPaneUI` class to
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 08:23:50 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>> Issue is due to the condition added for the opaque property of
>> SynthTabbedPane in
>> [JDK-8226990](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8226990). The previous fix
>> for GTK and Nimbus was handled commonly in `SynthTabbedPaneUI`
On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 06:13:15 GMT, Abhishek Kumar wrote:
> Issue is due to the condition added for the opaque property of
> SynthTabbedPane in
> [JDK-8226990](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8226990). The previous fix
> for GTK and Nimbus was handled commonly in `SynthTabbedPaneUI` class to
On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 06:13:15 GMT, Abhishek Kumar wrote:
> Issue is due to the condition added for the opaque property of
> SynthTabbedPane in
> [JDK-8226990](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8226990). The previous fix
> for GTK and Nimbus was handled commonly in `SynthTabbedPaneUI` class to
On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 19:44:40 GMT, Damon Nguyen wrote:
> But why does this only apply to custom LAFs? What does Nimbus and GTK do
> differently? Because I'm assuming the fix was for all 3 before, but now
> you're just removing the fix from Synth and applying it to GTK & Nimbus.
The painter for
On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 06:13:15 GMT, Abhishek Kumar wrote:
> Issue is due to the condition added for the opaque property of
> SynthTabbedPane in
> [JDK-8226990](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8226990). The previous fix
> for GTK and Nimbus was handled commonly in `SynthTabbedPaneUI` class to
On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 22:12:59 GMT, Alisen Chung wrote:
>> Issue is due to the condition added for the opaque property of
>> SynthTabbedPane in
>> [JDK-8226990](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8226990). The previous fix
>> for GTK and Nimbus was handled commonly in `SynthTabbedPaneUI` class
On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 06:13:15 GMT, Abhishek Kumar wrote:
> Issue is due to the condition added for the opaque property of
> SynthTabbedPane in
> [JDK-8226990](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8226990). The previous fix
> for GTK and Nimbus was handled commonly in `SynthTabbedPaneUI` class to
Issue is due to the condition added for the opaque property of SynthTabbedPane
in [JDK-8226990](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8226990). The previous fix
for GTK and Nimbus was handled commonly in `SynthTabbedPaneUI` class to render
the tabs based on opaque property. Since the Synth package
13 matches
Mail list logo