On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 13:41:44 GMT, Zdenek Zambersky wrote:
> This fixes stack smashing issue in awt library on linux s390x. (jdk compiled
> with `-fstack-protector-strong`)
>
> Fix is based on patch
> [submitted](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/awt-dev/2019-July/015337.html)
> in JDK-822791
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 13:41:44 GMT, Zdenek Zambersky wrote:
> This fixes stack smashing issue in awt library on linux s390x. (jdk compiled
> with `-fstack-protector-strong`)
>
> Fix is based on patch
> [submitted](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/awt-dev/2019-July/015337.html)
> in JDK-822791
On Tue, 20 May 2025 14:18:06 GMT, Zdenek Zambersky wrote:
>>> That looks right, and it should also be good for backports. The root cause
>>> must be a bug in Xlib, though. Has anyone found it, or reported it?
>>
>> That was my thought too : "Looks reasonable although it seems an odd
>> behavi
On Fri, 16 May 2025 18:19:22 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
> That looks right, and it should also be good for backports. The root cause
> must be a bug in Xlib, though. Has anyone found it, or reported it?
I have not identified the root cause. I think bug could also be in kinput2 or
it's interaction w
On Fri, 16 May 2025 12:18:09 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
> That looks right, and it should also be good for backports. The root cause
> must be a bug in Xlib, though. Has anyone found it, or reported it?
That was my thought too : "Looks reasonable although it seems an odd behaviour
(bug?) of XGe
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 13:41:44 GMT, Zdenek Zambersky wrote:
> This fixes stack smashing issue in awt library on linux s390x. (jdk compiled
> with `-fstack-protector-strong`)
>
> Fix is based on patch
> [submitted](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/awt-dev/2019-July/015337.html)
> in JDK-822791
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 13:41:44 GMT, Zdenek Zambersky wrote:
> This fixes stack smashing issue in awt library on linux s390x. (jdk compiled
> with `-fstack-protector-strong`)
>
> Fix is based on patch
> [submitted](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/awt-dev/2019-July/015337.html)
> in JDK-822791
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 15:10:29 GMT, Zdenek Zambersky wrote:
>> Attaching jdk_awt jtreg results (with and without fix).
>> [jdk-awt-results.tgz](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/19430946/jdk-awt-results.tgz)
>
>> @zzambers Sorry for my late reaction. Is it possible to add test result by
>>
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 13:41:44 GMT, Zdenek Zambersky wrote:
> This fixes stack smashing issue in awt library on linux s390x. (jdk compiled
> with `-fstack-protector-strong`)
>
> Fix is based on patch
> [submitted](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/awt-dev/2019-July/015337.html)
> in JDK-822791
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 13:57:31 GMT, Zdenek Zambersky wrote:
>> This fixes stack smashing issue in awt library on linux s390x. (jdk compiled
>> with `-fstack-protector-strong`)
>>
>> Fix is based on patch
>> [submitted](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/awt-dev/2019-July/015337.html)
>> in JDK-
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 13:57:31 GMT, Zdenek Zambersky wrote:
>> This fixes stack smashing issue in awt library on linux s390x. (jdk compiled
>> with `-fstack-protector-strong`)
>>
>> Fix is based on patch
>> [submitted](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/awt-dev/2019-July/015337.html)
>> in JDK-
This fixes stack smashing issue in awt library on linux s390x. (jdk compiled
with `-fstack-protector-strong`)
Fix is based on
[patch](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/awt-dev/2019-July/015337.html)
submitted in JDK-8227919 review thread, rebased to master. They decided to go
for Solaris only
12 matches
Mail list logo
