On Sep 25, 8:33 pm, Stuart Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Allen,
> Here's the result, which I just committed:
Cool, thanks.
Allen
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to
Hi Allen,
Looks pretty good to me. I changed the name to "throws", which is
short, at least. The (is :a :a) can be replaced by (count-assertion),
which is public, even though the counter itself is private. I also
added an extra (catch...) clause so that there's a failure if the form
throws an e
Regular functions have this clever ability to have their variadic
arguments applied lazily:
user=> (defn z [a & r] "zero")
#'user/z
user=> (apply z (iterate inc 0))
"zero"
Since the z function ignored the r sequence, apply didn't bother
walking down the infinite sequence at all.
Multimethods do
On Sep 24, 9:37 am, soyrochus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, is there any intention to make Clojure self hosting? No
> technical barriers here, I guess, but priorities and intention count
> all the more so.
I can't speak for Rich Hickey's intentions, here, but I doubt it.
Most of the core la
On Sep 24, 6:37 am, soyrochus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, is there any intention to make Clojure self hosting? No
> technical barriers here, I guess, but priorities and intention count
> all the more so.
Just as a third-party person who is interested in Clojure, could you
tell me what the
On Sep 24, 9:37 am, soyrochus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been playing with Clojure. Impressive indeed. I´ve got two
> questions. Please consider these to be idle speculation (and as such
> worthy of your attention) and no "feature requests".
>
> First, is there any intention t
