Hi,
is there a clojure 1.5 cheatsheet somewhere, the last I could find was 1.4.
Thanks,
--
László Török
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new
http://jafingerhut.github.io
kl. 11:38:41 UTC+2 mandag 24. juni 2013 skrev Las følgende:
Hi,
is there a clojure 1.5 cheatsheet somewhere, the last I could find was 1.4.
Thanks,
--
László Török
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure
core.match 0.2.0-rc1 going out the door. ClojureScript support now up to
date with Clojure. I've also changed the ClojureScript version to optimize
for performance over code size as the code size issues are less problematic
for ClojureScript than they are for the JVM.
Thanks a lot for tracing through my code! So, as I understand it, my
loop/recur is correct, but I was not using map in a correct way within the
vector functions.
By the way, what is your (pst e*) line doing? Is that from a debugging
library? I don't appear to have that in my clojure
I've written up how core.match works here
http://github.com/clojure/core.match/wiki/Understanding-the-algorithm
Hopefully this is a bit more approachable than the Maranget paper :)
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
core.match 0.2.0-rc1 going out the
pst is printstacktrace, it's in the clojure.repl namespace and comes with
clojure. Sometimes lein or something makes it available automatically,
but if it isn't, you can (use 'clojure.repl) to get to it.
http://clojure.github.io/clojure/clojure.repl-api.html#clojure.repl/pst
Yes, switching to
Hi Stuart,
ok, so my question is actually more about how to create some clojure Runtime,
filling it with additional namespaces, i.e. more than just clojure.core.
I just discovered the RT class which could be what I want ( though its not
official API ?)
I need to make clojure runtime avail.
Hey David,
I wanted to try core.match for a while and fiddled around a bit to see what
kind of code is generated by match, in doing so I found a potentially
dangerous bug.
See: https://gist.github.com/thheller/5850693#file-match-clj-L67
If a match has no :else clause an
Martin,
Thanks for the kind feedback. I've written a tutorial (first draft) that
covers some of the basics, and created a leiningen template for
quick-starting a new HTTP-Kit/clj-wamp project:
http://cljwamp.us/tutorial
https://github.com/cgmartin/clj-wamp-template
Cheers,
~Christopher Martin
Why does `into` fail when the 2-element collections are lists and not
vectors? :
~~~
user= (into {} [[:a 1] [:b 2]])
{:a 1, :b 2}
user= (into {} ['(:a 1) '(:b 2)])
ClassCastException clojure.lang.Keyword cannot be cast to
java.util.Map$Entry clojure.lang.ATransientMap.conj
Great! Thanks so much for your help!
On Monday, June 24, 2013 10:50:57 AM UTC-4, Gary Trakhman wrote:
pst is printstacktrace, it's in the clojure.repl namespace and comes with
clojure. Sometimes lein or something makes it available automatically,
but if it isn't, you can (use
Thanks for the report, fixed and 0.2.0-rc2 is going out.
Probably going to hold off on ex-info change, the behavior of match is the
same as `case` with respect to the no match exception.
David
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Thomas Heller th.hel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey David,
I wanted to
Hi,
I've been exploring core.logic while working through The Reasoned Schemer
and would like to be able to describe relationships between IP addresses
and networks that they may or may not be a part of. It's straightforward to
do this in Clojure because I can use bit-and on a network and a
Yeah there's no good way to do this out of the box. You probably want to
define some custom constraints - to perform well you might even need to go
so far as to define a new constraint domain.
Things are not at the point where I feel comfortably describing how this
can be done as the details are
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:49 AM, John Gabriele jmg3...@gmail.com wrote:
Why does `into` fail when the 2-element collections are lists and not
vectors? :
Because the implementation special cases vectors :)
It's the one place where a two element vector is treated like a
Map$Entry so that you are
That link is also available near the top of
http://clojure.org/cheatsheet(Download other versions with
tooltips).
There are a few things new in 1.5 on the latest version, but I haven't yet
included any of the new reducers functions there yet. If anyone has a
better suggestion for categorizing
On 6/24/13 7:53 AM, Jörg Winter wrote:
Hi Stuart,
ok, so my question is actually more about how to create some clojure Runtime,
filling it with additional namespaces, i.e. more than just clojure.core.
I just discovered the RT class which could be what I want ( though its not
official API
Cool. Thanks for the quick feedback (also thanks for core.logic). I'll
continue experimenting.
-Dave
On Monday, June 24, 2013 12:14:14 PM UTC-4, David Nolen wrote:
Yeah there's no good way to do this out of the box. You probably want to
define some custom constraints - to perform well you
The condp form is very nice and concise if you have multiple match clauses.
If you are more generally just looking to perform a single
match/assign/branch task, I'd recommend this little nugget of clojure
wisdom: Forget ye not the hidden might of if-let.
(if-let [[_ from to message] (re-find
Thx, i saw that but the page says 1.3 and 1.4 :-)
Sent from my phone
On Jun 24, 2013 6:17 PM, Andy Fingerhut andy.finger...@gmail.com wrote:
That link is also available near the top of
http://clojure.org/cheatsheet(Download other versions with tooltips).
There are a few things new in 1.5 on
That was quick, thanks.
One Question for vector matches, I was thinking of a 'case-ex macro which
basically copies the semantics of erlangs case-expressions.
eg.
(case-ex (db/find-object some-id)
[:ok object] object
[:error :not-found] default-object)
expands to
(match [(db/find-object
Thanks Kevin, it's all clear now.
Sent from my phone
On Jun 24, 2013 6:38 PM, Kevin Downey redc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/24/13 7:53 AM, Jörg Winter wrote:
Hi Stuart,
ok, so my question is actually more about how to create some clojure
Runtime, filling it with additional namespaces, i.e.
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce the release of cljson 1.0.0, a Clojure and
ClojureScript data serialization library designed for maximal Clojure data
deserialization speed in the browser:
https://github.com/tailrecursion/cljson. cljson was designed to take
advantage of the native JSON parsing
Hey,
this looks pretty sweet! I stuck with EDN for now but its way too slow, so
I'm gonna give this a shot.
One thing: I'm don't think its the best idea to fall back to
*default-data-readers*, would you be open to adding a second argument to
'cljson-clj which takes a map specifying readers?
On Monday, June 24, 2013 12:14:56 PM UTC-4, Sean Corfield wrote:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:49 AM, John Gabriele
jmg...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Why does `into` fail when the 2-element collections are lists and not
vectors? :
Because the implementation special cases vectors :)
On Jun 24, 2013, at 11:14 , Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:49 AM, John Gabriele jmg3...@gmail.com wrote:
Why does `into` fail when the 2-element collections are lists and not
vectors? :
Because the implementation special cases vectors :)
It's the
Glad you enjoy! And yes, totally into the cljson-clj [map data] arity.
Alan
On Monday, June 24, 2013 1:50:00 PM UTC-4, Thomas Heller wrote:
Hey,
this looks pretty sweet! I stuck with EDN for now but its way too slow, so
I'm gonna give this a shot.
One thing: I'm don't think its the best
What, precisely, happens if two threads sharing a reference to a single
lazy sequence try to realize the same element at the same time? If the
sequence is completely pure and deterministic, so any attempt to realize a
particular element will produce a single particular value consistently
(unlike,
Realizing a lazy-seq is done through a synchronized method see:
https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/src/jvm/clojure/lang/LazySeq.java#L37
No race conditions.
Cedric Greevey writes:
What, precisely, happens if two threads sharing a reference to a single
lazy sequence try to realize
Useful tools for writing gnome extensions in cljs:
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first
(I fell afoul of the new gmail compose window)
Useful tools for writing gnome extensions in cljs:
https://github.com/jamii/lein-gnome
As a side effect, allows injecting a cljs repl into gnome-shell.
On 24 June 2013 23:02, Jamie Brandon ja...@scattered-thoughts.net wrote:
Useful tools for
Ah, thanks. The locking granularity is local to the cons cell (or analogue;
first/rest pair) being realized, I hope? So one thread actually calculates
an element and neither call returns until it's calculated, and then both
promptly return the calculated value, but threads realizing other lazy
(defn foo [x y z]
(let [x (long x) y (long y) z (long z)])
(loop [a false b (long 0)]
(if a b (recur true (+ x (+ y z))
NO_SOURCE_PATH:1 recur arg for primitive local: b is not matching
primitive, had: Object, needed: long
Auto-boxing loop arg: b
What the fuh? Binary + with
I got a Can't type hint a local with a primitive initializer triggered by
the following fragment of a let binding vector:
^BigDecimal d0x (- x (:x rp))
^BigDecimal d0y (- y (:y rp))
d0x2 (- (* d0x d0x) (* d0y d0y))
d0y2 (* 2M (* d0x d0y))
d0x3 (-
Reading the LazySeq.java file should make this all clear, but yes, no race
conditions.
https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/src/jvm/clojure/lang/LazySeq.java#L37
Synchronized methods basically lock the current instance of the object
while the method runs, so it is impossible for two
I'm familiar with what synchronized Type foo (args) does -- my last
question was more about what aspect of a lazy seq the object with the
method corresponds to. Cons cell or similar subunit? I could read half of
clojure.lang, learn how all the various types of seq (Cons, LazySeq,
ChunkedSeq,
It corresponds to the execution of the LazySeq fn. That fn will be called
once and only once, the rest of the data in the object is immutable and
side-effect free and therefore does not need to be synchronized.
Timothy
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Cedric Greevey cgree...@gmail.com wrote:
So, is the granularity that of seq realization -- individual [first rest]
cells for (iterate inc 0), single chunks for (range), etc.? I'd appreciate
a straight, direct, yes-or-no answer to that question.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Timothy Baldridge tbaldri...@gmail.comwrote:
It
Good call. I agree the prefix shortening should be more noticeable since
it's found throughout the examples.
I've given it its own section now: http://cljwamp.us/tutorial#wampprefix
Again, much thanks for the feedback!
On Monday, June 24, 2013 1:51:25 PM UTC-4, martin_clausen wrote:
That is
Nice work. How about adding this
https://github.com/tavendo/AutobahnPython/tree/master/examples/wamp/authentication
WAMP-CRA
(WAMP Challenge Response Authentication)?
On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 6:52:40 AM UTC+3, Christopher Martin wrote:
Good call. I agree the prefix shortening should be more
The first 100 lines of LazySeq.java contain all the answers. Read it, and
be enlightened. :-) And as a bonus, you'll better understand the language
as a whole.
Timothy
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Cedric Greevey cgree...@gmail.com wrote:
So, is the granularity that of seq realization --
Thanks! I saw that too in the Autobahn docs. I'll add that source link to
the GitHub issue I'm tracking for that feature @
https://github.com/cgmartin/clj-wamp/issues/3
On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:04:21 AM UTC-4, Juha Syrjälä wrote:
Nice work. How about adding this
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Timothy Baldridge tbaldri...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Cedric Greevey cgree...@gmail.comwrote:
So, is the granularity that of seq realization -- individual [first
rest] cells for (iterate inc 0), single chunks for (range), etc.? I'd
An opensource memcached client for clojure wrapping
xmemcachedhttp://code.google.com/p/xmemcached/.It
released 0.2.2, added 'clj-json-transcoder' that encode/decode values using
clojure.data.json.
https://github.com/killme2008/clj-xmemcached
--
庄晓丹
Email:killme2...@gmail.com
You have what is likely an undesired right paren at the end of the let
line, ending the scope of the let.
Andy
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Cedric Greevey cgree...@gmail.com wrote:
(defn foo [x y z]
(let [x (long x) y (long y) z (long z)])
(loop [a false b (long 0)]
(if a b
Huh. How did that happen? And why didn't my IDE indent the code
differently, making the problem obvious?
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Andy Fingerhut
andy.finger...@gmail.comwrote:
You have what is likely an undesired right paren at the end of the let
line, ending the scope of the let.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Cedric Greevey cgree...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, thanks. The locking granularity is local to the cons cell (or
analogue; first/rest pair) being realized, I hope? So one thread actually
calculates an element and neither call returns until it's calculated, and
then
47 matches
Mail list logo