Re: sp mm training in hyderabada

2015-04-19 Thread Sergey Didenko
I can't believe people don't see it's a conspiracy. Some accounts were hacked, payed and emulated to bring more attention to this spam. The most disturbing sign IMHO is creation of "Sean Corfield" account that was grown for many years bringing support and value to Clojure community for the sake o

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.7.0-beta1 released

2015-04-19 Thread Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant
This looks like the minimal case: ;; beta1 user=> (let [x 1] (let [{:keys [a b] :or {a b}} {}] a)) CompilerException java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to resolve symbol: b in this context, compiling:(/tmp/form-init3618156055290903409.clj:1:12) This returns nil in at least alpha1, could someone

Re: [ANN] Clojure 1.7.0-beta1 released

2015-04-19 Thread vrakade
Possible issue with doseq in 1.7.0-beta1? Was working in 1.7.0-alpha5. (Found with clj-jgit) Leiningen 2.5.1 on Java 1.8.0_31 Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM Error: #error{:cause Unable to resolve symbol: private-key in this context, :via [{:type clojure.lang.Compiler$CompilerException, :me

[CFP] Scheme and Functional Programming Workshop 2015

2015-04-19 Thread Andy Keep
*Call For Papers:* *Scheme and Functional Programming Workshop 2015* *Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada* *(Co-located with ICFP 2015)* http://andykeep.com/SchemeWorkshop2015/ Submissions related to Scheme, Racket, Clojure, and functional programming are welcome and encouraged. Topics of inter

[ANN] Catacumba 0.1.0-alpha1: Asynchronous and non-blocking web toolkit for Clojure

2015-04-19 Thread Andrey Antukh
Hi I'm happy to announce the first alpha of catacumba, the asynchronous and non-blocking web toolkit for Clojure build on top of ratpack[1] and netty[2]. Here a incomplete list of things that Catacumba intends to have: - a flexible and extensible way to setup different kind of handlers. - build

Re: Are keys and vals guaranteed to return in the same order?

2015-04-19 Thread Thumbnail
... For example (let [m1 (array-map 1 2, 3 4) m2 (array-map 3 4, 1 2)] [(= m1 m2) (= (seq m1) (seq m2))]) => [true false] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that

Re: Are keys and vals guaranteed to return in the same order?

2015-04-19 Thread Thumbnail
*Is order guaranteed?* For any map m, (= m (zipmap (keys m) (vals m))) ... is guaranteed. But, for two maps m1 and m2, (= m1 m2) ... does *not* imply (= (seq m1) (seq m2)) *Which version to prefer?* It's worth looking at what the Clojure Cookbook does