Thank you Mr. Alex Miller!
Fancy printing of exceptions is working :)
Geraldo
On Friday, April 10, 2015 at 4:26:30 PM UTC-3, Alex Miller wrote:
Clojure 1.7.0-beta1 is now available.
Try it via
- Download:
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/clojure/clojure/1.7.0-beta1/
- Leiningen:
Any reason why we don't have `any?`. Googled without much luck.
Trivially done as `comp boolean some` not doubt, but I know I use it more
than not-any at least.
It's particularly useful as a composable `or`.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure
bleh, hit reply too fast. Or also returns the first true value, so (or
false nil 42) returns 42.
I guess I don't see when I'd use 'any?'
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Timothy Baldridge tbaldri...@gmail.com
wrote:
But it's not really like `or
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 7:32 PM, coltnz
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 4:11:40 PM UTC-5, Allen Rohner wrote:
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 12:02:08 PM UTC-5, Mike Fikes wrote:
Hey Tony, try updating the version of Clojure in your project.clj to
1.7.0-beta1, which is used by 0.0-3211.
(In short, reader/read was given a
Do you mean any? as in
(defn any? [p c]
(boolean (seq (filter? p c
Thanks,
Ambrose
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Timothy Baldridge tbaldri...@gmail.com
wrote:
bleh, hit reply too fast. Or also returns the first true value, so (or
false nil 42) returns 42.
I guess I don't see when
You need to make sure some other dependency isn't pulling in a different
version of tools.reader.
David
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Allen Rohner aroh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 12:02:08 PM UTC-5, Mike Fikes wrote:
Hey Tony, try updating the version of Clojure
Hey Tony, try updating the version of Clojure in your project.clj to
1.7.0-beta1, which is used by 0.0-3211.
(In short, reader/read was given a second arity to allow options to be passed,
thus supporting #? conditional reading.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 12:02:08 PM UTC-5, Mike Fikes wrote:
Hey Tony, try updating the version of Clojure in your project.clj to
1.7.0-beta1, which is used by 0.0-3211.
(In short, reader/read was given a second arity to allow options to be
passed, thus supporting #? conditional
But it's not really like `or
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 7:32 PM, coltnz colin.tay...@gmail.com wrote:
Any reason why we don't have `any?`. Googled without much luck.
Trivially done as `comp boolean some` not doubt, but I know I use it more
than not-any at least.
It's particularly useful as a
I think 'some' fills this role. Given truthy values, why do you need to use
boolean with it?
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 8:32:09 PM UTC-5, Colin Taylor wrote:
Any reason why we don't have `any?`. Googled without much luck.
Trivially done as `comp boolean some` not doubt, but I know I use
I think Ambrose is getting at what the original poster is after. I've
written this a number of times, but seem to recall doing something like
`(def any? (complement not-any?))`, though I'd need to go back and look.
`not-any?` is just `(comp not some)` under the covers, so I guess I'm not
sure why
I should say all of that is for Clojure and likely bears no similarity to
the nuances in ClojureScript.
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 9:39:06 PM UTC-5, Alex Miller wrote:
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 9:33:18 AM UTC-5, Timur wrote:
Hi everyone,
There are situations where I want to
So I was thinking of:
user= (def any? (comp boolean some))
#'user/any?
user= (any? true? [false true false])
true
user= (any? even? [1 2 3])
true
; touch 3
user= (any? #(.exists %) [(file 1) (file 2) (file 3)])
true
Some motivations
- my main one is Java interop where use of non booleans would
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 9:33:18 AM UTC-5, Timur wrote:
Hi everyone,
There are situations where I want to dispatch functions using based on
their certain properties. I can also use case statements instead but it
looks more coupled and more change is required if I want to add new
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 1:47:27 AM UTC-4, Mike Rodriguez wrote:
I agree about wanting to use the explicit argument name surrounded by
markdown quotes in docs. I've definitely started adopting this practice and
wish there were conventions around this sort of thing. Without it, doc
My god, you save me. Thanks!
2015년 4월 25일 토요일 오후 12시 48분 25초 UTC+9, James Reeves 님의 말:
(str nil)
=
(type nil)
= nil
(str (type nil))
=
Rather than use `str`, try using `pr-str` to get a more accurate
representation of the data:
(pr-str nil)
= nil
Hi everyone,
There are situations where I want to dispatch functions using based on
their certain properties. I can also use case statements instead but it
looks more coupled and more change is required if I want to add new types.
What I want to ask is if I need to avoid using multi-methods
I have found long docs like that to be useful in some major top-level function
if it has a large sort of input and configuration parameters to pass in.
Markdown I believe means with back ticks around the symbol to make it stand out
as an actual art name vs some other word in the sentence. I
Hi,
I'm getting the following error when running cljsbuild with the latest
clojurescript build (3211). Changing back to 3126 makes the build work.
Haven't been able to pinpoint the source.
clojure.lang.ArityException: Wrong number of args (2) passed to: reader/read
at
19 matches
Mail list logo
