[ANN] Dominator 0.3.0

2015-06-07 Thread David Sargeant
* Fixed an issue where style wasn't being applied properly across all browsers. * Added animation-frames http://dubiousdavid.github.io/dominator/doc/dominator.core.html#var-animation-frames signal to sync rendering computations with requestAnimationFrame

Re: [ANN] Time-Bombed Open License - thoughts?

2015-06-07 Thread Alan Moore
Oops. Autocomplete fail. Thanks for the correct correction. I look forward to further discussions on the list, see you there. Alan -- *Whatever you can do, or dream you can do, begin it. Boldness has genius, power, and magic in it. Begin it now.* - *Goethe* On Jun 7, 2015, at 1:05 PM, Tj

Re: [ANN] Time-Bombed Open License - thoughts?

2015-06-07 Thread Tj Gabbour
For those confused like I was, the correct link is https://coopsource.org (FWIW, I found your entire wall of text very interesting, as it was sensible and contains points almost never mentioned. Could've read a longer version.) On Sunday, June 7, 2015 at 6:09:25 PM UTC+2, Alan Moore wrote:

Re: [ANN] Time-Bombed Open License - thoughts?

2015-06-07 Thread Daniel Kersten
One thing worth pointing out is that OSS needn't be free as in beer. I've paid for OSS SaaS products because I don't want to host and admin them myself, for example. If your service provides something above and beyond what the source provides (and the OSS freedom), then you *may* still have a

Re: [ANN] Time-Bombed Open License - thoughts?

2015-06-07 Thread Alan Moore
Agreed. Code is almost beside the point in my mind. I'm not so much promoting a license as promoting a way of doing business, an alternative to the VC funded startup or too short lived/pivoting businesses that leave customers in the lurch. Fairness, resiliency and other factors of a business are

Re: Help with data structure transformation

2015-06-07 Thread gianluca torta
see also this page: http://clojure.org/sequences where for is listed among the seq library functions HTH Gianluca -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new

Re: [ANN] Time-Bombed Open License - thoughts?

2015-06-07 Thread Laurent PETIT
Is this discussion still related to clojure in any way ? (If at all) Le lundi 8 juin 2015, Warren warren.stra...@gmail.com a écrit : If you are concerned about the free-rider problem, why not dual license under AGPL? It's seems sufficiently viral that most commercial entities will elect to

Re: [ANN] Time-Bombed Open License - thoughts?

2015-06-07 Thread Alan Moore
Fergal, *Warning* - Wall of text ahead! If you think OSS works perfectly fine the way it is today feel free to press delete now... I've been holding back commenting on this thread to see where it would go. It is nice to see everyone's take on the need for (or not) a solution to the lack of an

ANN: clojure-objc 1.7.0-RC1

2015-06-07 Thread Gal Dolber
## Dependencies https://github.com/galdolber/clojure-objc [galdolber/clojure-objc 1.7.0-RC1] https://github.com/galdolber/lein-objcbuild [lein-objcbuild 0.1.9] ## Changes * Sync with clojure 1.7.0-RC1 * Consistent anonymous functions naming to prevent cascade changes, resulting on faster

Re: [ANN] Time-Bombed Open License - thoughts?

2015-06-07 Thread Warren
If you are concerned about the free-rider problem, why not dual license under AGPL? It's seems sufficiently viral that most commercial entities will elect to take a commercial license, but it allows the source to be leveraged by other open source projects. The only downside is that AGPL