I'm curious if it would be enough to write a macro that replaces defn in
your code? The macro would secretly generate a different function for every
arity, and therefore it could have a different doc-string for every arity,
but it wouldn't have to appear that way in your code. Is that enough, or
Marginalia 0.9.1 is out!
Marginalia is a source code documentation tool that parses Clojure and
ClojureScript code and outputs a side-by-side source view with appropriate
comments and docstrings aligned.
If you haven't yet, try it out in your project:
Add [[lein-marginalia "0.9.1"]] to the :pl
blockchain.info provides an API for building bitcoin apps.
This is a clojure wrapper for it.
https://github.com/eliassona/bchain
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that
Eval gets a bad reputation from languages like JS where it's messy and a
bit of a security risk. In Clojure, there's nothing wrong with using eval
for something like this.
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Nick Mudge
wrote:
> I need to dynamically reify some java interfaces based on data from a
>
I've used `import-vars` before, most notably in `java-time`. Even though
I've never had any problems with the imported vars, I'm aware many people
dislike the method so I'm writing the APIs in `$project.core` namespaces
now.
Would be great if anyone who had problems or is otherwise directly awa