On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 at 4:56:24 PM UTC-8, Christopher Small wrote:
You may be right about an object-oriented approach being the most natural
> here. But, I'd encourage you to keep an open mind. Clojure has this
> particular way of encouraging you to and rewarding you for describing you
A Wize One once said
> Closures are the poor man's objects
It's easy to build "object-like" things in clojure. Just create a map
pointing to whatever you like, including stateful things, like atoms. Then
write functions which take that map and do stuff with it. Clojure's Records
and Protocols
How do the aims of this undertaking compare with Pedestal?
http://pedestal.io/ says, "Pedestal supports Tomcat, Jetty, Immutant (with
Undertow), Vert.x, ..."
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to cloju
Thanks for the kind words, I hope you enjoy it!
On Wednesday, January 10, 2018 at 12:27:35 PM UTC-5, Shaun Gilchrist wrote:
>
> This looks like it will be a LOT of fun to play with. Also there is
> nothing like waking up and finding in your inbox a project you only wished
> you had the time to w
Greetings :: I am new to Clojure and have not really gotten my feet wet
with Clojurescript yet. The advice I always give someone when leaning
programming or a new language is to pick a project that they are interested
in and dive in. For me, that project would be creating educational
simulation
On Monday, January 8, 2018 at 12:14:59 AM UTC-5, James Gatannah wrote:
> FWIW, I think https://leanpub.com/specter looks extremely interesting.
> (Or it may be awful...I haven't had a chance to read it yet, much less work
> through the exercises).
>
Actually, I worked through that ebook last
This looks like it will be a LOT of fun to play with. Also there is nothing
like waking up and finding in your inbox a project you only wished you had
the time to work on but would much rather just use! Thank you!
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Steven Yi wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to announc
A few other points of design:
1) Move the requires into the `ns` form:
(ns example.simple-http-server
(:require [io.vertx.clojure.core.core :as core]
[io.vertex.lang.clojure.vertx :as vertx]))
2) If you make sure that your functions always return the first argument
passed to th
Thanks a lot
we modify the hello code to following:
(ns examples.simple-http-server)
(require
'[io.vertx.clojure.core.core :as core]
'[io.vertx.lang.clojure.vertx :as vertx]
'[io.vertx.lang.clojure.http-server :as server]
'[io.vertx.lang.clojure.http-server-request :as request]
'[io.vertx.la
It’s not clear what the "do" is supposed to mean in those defns (unless there’s
some deep dark magic going on, they are currently not doing anything and you
can just remove them), and you very likely want "let" instead of "def" for the
local variables.
def in Clojure does not follow lexical sco
And here is the simple example "Hello from Vert.x!" like other languages on
the Vert.x official frontpage:
(ns examples.simple-http-server)
(require
'[io.vertx.clojure.core.core :as core]
'[io.vertx.lang.clojure.vertx :as vertx]
'[io.vertx.lang.clojure.http-server :as server]
'[io.vertx.lang
Hi Toby:
We just complete most parts of vertx-lang-clojure, here is the project
address:
https://github.com/chengenzhao/vertx-lang-clojure
all reviews and suggestions and issues and PRs are welcomed
Cheers
On Friday, December 29, 2017 at 8:50:53 PM UTC+8, Toby Crawley wrote:
>
> The short answe
12 matches
Mail list logo
