gt;
> Chad Harrington
> chad.ha...@gmail.com
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:38 AM Łukasz Korecki > wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> We're interested in the Date/Time/Timestamp part of the spec. A bit of
>> background: our RabbitMQ framework (
>> ht
our use
> case will help with the design.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chad Harrington
> chad.ha...@gmail.com
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 1:39 AM Łukasz Korecki > wrote:
>
>> This looks great! Thank you for sharing
>> Any plans for logical types[1] support? That&#
This looks great! Thank you for sharing
Any plans for logical types[1] support? That's one of the biggest things
missing in Abracad imho
Łukasz
[1] - https://avro.apache.org/docs/1.8.0/spec.html#Logical+Types
On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 2:57:18 AM UTC, Chad Harrington wrote:
>
> https://gi
I've run tests against our biggest Clojure app (~40k LOC with tests) - no
failures, Uberjar compiled cleanly as well.
We're giong to deploy it to our testing environment early next week.
Łukasz
On Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 4:11:45 PM UTC+1, Alex Miller wrote:
>
> 1.10.0-RC1 is now available
On Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 4:46:05 PM UTC+1, Austin Haas wrote:
>
> Thanks for the replies.
>
> I only want a stable REPL, integrated with Emacs, and nothing else.
>
> Łukasz, why did you switch to Monroe? What do you prefer about it?
If I'm not mistaken inf-clojure works best if you use the s
Hi!
I've recently switched to Monroe - https://github.com/sanel/monroe
Its feature set is quite limited, and it boils down to:
- start a nREPL server
- connect to it
- a REPL buffer is created inside of Emacs
- evaluate forms
I've added a tiny bit of config on my side which adds a Clojure scrat
Hi all!
I'm wondering how people are getting application performance metrics out of
their clojure applications?
My team is using a combination of collectd for machine/os metrics and
statsd instrumentation for application level code (RabbitMQ consumers, http
handlers etc).
All of that data is se
This is great - we're planning to open source our tiny consumer lib - there
might be no need after all :-)
Looking at the source and the readme it's **very** similar to our solution.
Łukasz
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post
