Re: Fully lazy sequences are coming - feedback wanted!

[Aaron Scott]

How about e-rest, for the empty set returning version? Perry Trolard wrote: If it's the case that rest will almost exclusively appear in the context of constructing lazy-seqs (lazy-seq (cons [something] (rest [something])) & next will appear all over, it makes sense to me to sacrifice brevity in the case of rest, & give next the right name: "rest" --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---