Re: Flightcaster makes a couple big open source contributions

2009-12-03 Thread bradford cross
er-blog.org/2009/12/03/flightcaster/ > > David > > > On Dec 3, 3:19 pm, bradford cross wrote: > > Incanter: > http://measuringmeasures.blogspot.com/2009/12/flightcaster-merges-sta... > > > > Crane: > http://measuringmeasures.blogspot.com/2009/12/flightcaster-ope

Flightcaster makes a couple big open source contributions

2009-12-03 Thread bradford cross
Incanter: http://measuringmeasures.blogspot.com/2009/12/flightcaster-merges-statistical.html Crane: http://measuringmeasures.blogspot.com/2009/12/flightcaster-open-sources-crane_03.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this

(+ clojure cascading)

2009-09-17 Thread bradford cross
We're going to have a meetup on clojure and cascading and Rapleaf Sept 24th: http://blog.rapleaf.com/dev/?p=196 Come on by. Debate about function composition as a programming model for distributed computation. Impress your friends. -b --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You

Re: clojure success story ... hopefully :-)

2009-08-22 Thread bradford cross
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Michel Salim wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 23:00 -0700, bradford cross wrote: > > > > > Destructuring is useful all over the place, not just for pattern > > matching. For example, it is really useful in function parameter > >

Re: clojure success story ... hopefully :-)

2009-08-22 Thread bradford cross
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Sigrid wrote: > > Hi Meikel, hi all, > > thanks for the explanation, I think I got it now. I suppose something > in the sentence I quoted led me to think that pattern matching was > "less" in a way than destructuring, whereas in fact it seems to be the > opposite

Re: clojure success story ... hopefully :-)

2009-08-14 Thread bradford cross
share with the community? Chad Harrington chad.harring...@gmail.com On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:10 PM, bradford cross wrote: > > We have just released flightcaster.com which uses statistical inference and machine learning to ... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Yo

Re: Keyword not serializable

2009-08-14 Thread bradford cross
the serializeability issues also come up with cascading/hadoop. On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Chas Emerick wrote: > > On Jul 31, 1:47 pm, Chris Kent wrote: > > Great. As far as my (possibly flawed) understanding goes it should be > > pretty simple. Make it implementSerializableand add a re

Re: clojure success story ... hopefully :-)

2009-08-14 Thread bradford cross
whoa...missed the google spellcheckers' warning on: paralleizm ... although that may be the proper lolkidde spelling :-) On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:10 PM, bradford cross wrote: > We have just released flightcaster.com which uses statistical inference > and machine learning to pre

clojure success story ... hopefully :-)

2009-08-14 Thread bradford cross
We have just released flightcaster.com which uses statistical inference and machine learning to predict flight delays in advance of airlines (initial results appear to do so with 85 - 90 % accuracy.) The webserver and webapp are all rails running on the Heroku platform; which also serves our black

Re: Override the + operator for a 'struct'

2009-05-17 Thread bradford cross
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 1:40 PM, philip.hazel...@gmail.com < philip.hazel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On May 17, 1:14 am, "Michel S." wrote: > > In Clojure, it is possible to do the former -- (def orig+ +) -- but it > > appears that overriding a clojure.core definition is not possible. I'd > > love

Re: Override the + operator for a 'struct'

2009-05-16 Thread bradford cross
First item of business - there are no operators, operators are functions. I think the Clojure way to do this is via multimethods: http://clojure.org/multimethods I might just be naive, but it seems like more of core would need to be implemented as multimethods in order to do this. Has this come

Re: clojure dependency management and build

2009-04-13 Thread bradford cross
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Laurent PETIT wrote: > Hi, > > 2009/4/14 bradford cross > >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote: >> >>> On Apr 13, 2009, at 4:58 PM, bradford cross wrote: >>>

Re: clojure dependency management and build

2009-04-13 Thread bradford cross
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote: > On Apr 13, 2009, at 4:58 PM, bradford cross wrote: >> >> I have written up my journeys so far: >> http://bradfordcross.blogspot.com/2009/04/clojure-build-and-dependency-management.html >> > > Thanks very

Re: clojure dependency management and build

2009-04-13 Thread bradford cross
08.04.2009 um 21:31 schrieb Bradford Cross: > > I heard some chatter yesterday on #clojure about using Ivy with Clojure. >> > > Yes. I'm working on marrying Clojure and Ivy. So far with, IMHO, > great success. I set up a little ivy repo with clojure and contrib. > The

Re: clojure dependency management and build

2009-04-09 Thread Bradford Cross
oing about building up the classpath for your projects in slime/swan? Where does the rake come into play? > > > Multi-version dependency tracking is HARD. I've never seen a system > that does it perfectly -- Rubygems, CPAN, Maven, you name it. Yea, I don't imagine will solv

clojure dependency management and build

2009-04-08 Thread Bradford Cross
When you are building something real with Clojure and Emacs/Slime/Swank - things can get a bit hairy with dependency management. I have scoured the inter-tubes in the past couple days to see what I could find. I found Lancet, for builds: http://github.com/stuarthalloway/lancet/tree/master I hav