On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:23 PM, ataggart alex.tagg...@gmail.com wrote:
If you really need logging, then log4j is probably your best bet
anyway.
Or SLF4J, which seems to be the way many (most?) java libraries depend
on a some logging library.
--
You received this message because you are
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:46 AM, HB hubaghd...@gmail.com wrote:
Since Clojure is a LISP dialect, does this mean that it doesn't
support OOP?
Another answer is that ``it could be if you wanted it to be'', for example:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Vagif Verdi vagif.ve...@gmail.com wrote:
There a binary protocol library http://hessian.caucho.com/
+1
(also, there's a functionally equivalent text protocol, burlap, if you
need human readability in some situations, say development or
debugging. A common idiom
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com wrote:
[...] Individual users
If you are an individual user of Clojure, I encourage you to
contribute $100/year to Clojure development, via the donation system. [...]
That's less than 0.3 starbucks-coffees per day! (Even
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Matthew Williams
matthew.d.willi...@gmail.com wrote:
The project is up on Github: http://github.com/edgecase/ruby_koans
Another get-to-know-your-language project that I like is:
http://pythonchallenge.com
... and can be fun for wizards as well (since part of
No comments on this:
http://blogs.sun.com/mr/entry/closures
yet? It's no help to Clojure, but it's nice to see similar
motivations.
Also, I wanted to chime in with something like we already have
closures: use Clojure! or Jython, or... So how about TCO?
--
You received this message
--
Daniel Simms dsi...@dsimms.com
On Nov 24, 2009, at 22:23, Adrian Cuthbertson adrian.cuthbert...@gmail.com
wrote:
The other spin-off of this is that using the repl, one is able to
really explore the api's of these big libraries dynamically and get to
know them much more intimately than
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Alex Osborne a...@meshy.org wrote:
There's a 1.0 compatible branch on github. [...]
Thanks, I missed that branch.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Rayne disciplera...@gmail.com wrote:
but I would highly recommend that you just pull it from the github
repository.
Especially if you're going to use clojure-contrib ...or is there some
release of contrib synch'd to clojure releases that I missed
somewhere?
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Stuart Sierra
the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't be done. Once a fn is compiled, it's just Java bytecode.
On the other hand, size of the generated byte code is moderately
interesting (as is runtime performance in time and heap).
I do *love* the fact that
10 matches
Mail list logo
