Glad to help.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, s
tps://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!searchin/clojure/let-else/clojure/1g5dEvIvGYY/EWjwFGnS-rYJ
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
>
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Edward Tsech >
> wrote:
> > Sorry guys, I forget to mention that it should behave like "let"
get the final true/false for the if
> condition. You imply "and", which is a perfectly reasonable choice.
>
> My main reason for responding is to let you know that if you really want
> such behavior, macros let you roll your own without much trouble.
>
> Andy
>
>
Hey guys,
if-let and when-let macros support only 2 forms in binding vector:
(if-let [x 1 y 2]
...)
java.lang.IllegalArgumentExcepdtion: if-let requires exactly 2 forms in
binding vector(NO_SOURCE_FILE:1)
Why doesn't "if-let" support any even amount of binding forms as "let" does?
e.g.
(if-l
What do you think guys about informal meeting at the weekend?
On Monday, July 9, 2012 9:21:51 AM UTC+2, Zuzkins wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
> I, somehow, missed this thread but I am all up for clojure @ Prague
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Edward Tsech wrote:
>
>> HI Dani
HI Daniel,
I'm interested in Clojure and I would like to meet some Clojurians in
Prague too!
Ed
On Friday, June 29, 2012 12:21:58 PM UTC+2, Daniel Skarda wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> are there fellow Clojurians from Prague, Czech Republic using Clojure to
> attack real problems?
> I started with Clojure
