go. Compared to that,
the default answer in Clojure to do it yourself can sound like "go jump off
a cliff".
= Eric MacAdie
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Sean Johnson wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, May 4, 2015 at 4:41:02 AM UTC-4, Sven Richter wrote:
>
> All in all this is b
OT: Is there a way to download OpenJDK directly?
It looks like the download page only has directions on using package
managers. Perhaps I missed a link somewhere.
- Eric MacAdie
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 8:59 PM, John Gabriele wrote:
> On Saturday, June 15, 2013 9:40:13 PM UTC-4, Korny wr
OT, but, personally, I look forward to a world free of Javascript.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Bruce Durling wrote:
> Hey!
>
> Oh, and we use clojure for all of our stuff at Mastodon C that isn't
> html or javascript and I think the javascript's days are numbered.
>
> cheers,
> Bruce
>
> --
stall Cygwin.
- Eric MacAdie
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Gregory Graham wrote:
> I'm a Clojure newbie, and during Christmas break I decided to learn
> Clojure, and installed it on my Mac, using Emacs, Nrepl, and Leiningen 2.
> When I got back to work, I put the same setup on m
Thanks for the info. I will look this over, and perhaps finally build my
world-changing Clojure app. Or maybe just "Hello World."
- Eric MacAdie
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Marko Topolnik wrote:
> There's a pretty good page at
> heroku<https://devcenter.heroku.
Is there a page that gives "Clojure web recipes"? It would be great for
beginners if you could have one place that says "To make a web app, you
need X, Y and Z, and here are libraries that fulfil each of these needs."
- Eric MacAdie
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Sean
Is there a common unit testing framework for Clojure? I did some googling,
put all the results were a couple of years old.
- Eric MacAdie
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@google
Also: Isn't the JVM open source?
- Eric MacAdie
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Softaddicts
wrote:
> Given the number of JVM implementations available, I think you can qualify
> this
> as a low risk for the near future.
>
> If I would have to move our 15,000 lines code ba
I am also interested in helping out with ClojureDocs.
- Eric MacAdie
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:17 AM, cej38 wrote:
> I am interested in updating the clojure.contrib section.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure"
