[EuroClojure 2013] Call for Presentations now open

2013-07-17 Thread Stefan Hübner
Hi all, we’re excited to announce EuroClojure 2013 to be held in Berlin, Germany: “EuroClojure is the first 2-day, full-blown conference in Europe for the Clojure community. After an extremely successful 2012 edition in London we are replicating in Berlin this year! The conference will be

Re: ANN Ritz 0.5.0

2012-09-26 Thread Stefan Hübner
Hugo Duncan writes: > sthueb...@googlemail.com (Stefan Hübner) writes: > >> b) How can ritz-nrepl or (preferably) ritz-swank be embedded in an >> application? > > I just added instructions [1] to the ritz-swank README. I've not > actually tried this yet, but this

Re: ANN Ritz 0.5.0

2012-09-24 Thread Stefan Hübner
adrians writes: > Hi Hugo, > > I'm trying to get ritz-nrepl going with the latest lein2 and nrepl.el from > Melpa. I think > I've followed the instructions on the project page, yet I get this, when I > nrepl-ritz-jack-in: > > error in process sentinel: Could not start nREPL server: Exception in

Re: ANN Ritz 0.5.0

2012-09-21 Thread Stefan Hübner
Hi Hugo, I have two questions: a) Are you planning on updating Zi for this new release? b) How can ritz-nrepl or (preferably) ritz-swank be embedded in an application? Best Regards, Stefan Hugo Duncan writes: > Ritz provides a clojure debugger for nREPL.el and SLIME, other nREPL > middleware

Re: [ANN] nrepl.el 0.1.4 released

2012-09-18 Thread Stefan Hübner
I get the the following error when trying to auto-complete e.g. "(pri": --8<---cut here---start->8--- java.lang.NullPointerException: null at clojure.lang.Reflector.invokeNoArgInstanceMember (Reflector.java:314) clojure.stacktrace$print_stack_trace.invoke (

Re: ANN ritz 0.4.0 release with nREPL debugger support

2012-09-07 Thread Stefan Hübner
sthueb...@googlemail.com (Stefan Hübner) writes: > Hugo Duncan writes: > >> * ritz-swank corresponds to the previous ritz functionality and provides >> a swank server with debugger capabilities. > > How would you fire up a swank server from the REPL? On t

Re: ANN ritz 0.4.0 release with nREPL debugger support

2012-09-07 Thread Stefan Hübner
Hugo Duncan writes: > * ritz-swank corresponds to the previous ritz functionality and provides > a swank server with debugger capabilities. How would you fire up a swank server from the REPL? I'm using the Maven and the clojure-maven-plugin, which has no (yet) goal for ritz or ritz-swank. But

Re: MultipleArtifactsNotFoundException artifact missing error

2012-05-31 Thread Stefan Hübner
clojure.contrib.repl-utils migrated to clojure.repl, according to http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Where+Did+Clojure.Contrib+Go Softaddicts writes: > Since clojure 1.3, contrib as been replaced by distinct libraries: > > http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Where+Did+Clojure.Contrib+Go >

Re: Clojurians in Austria

2012-05-30 Thread Stefan Hübner
There was a "How to build communities" session at EuroClojure. In summary: - Just get going. Find some people (with 3 your already a group), find a place (like a pub for starters) and meet. You'll like it! - Meet regularly e.g. monthly. - If you want to do some coding and your group grows, find

Planet Clojure Feed Broken

2010-09-29 Thread Stefan Hübner
(sorry to use this channel) I just wanted to notice the maintainers of Planet Clojure, that it's RSS feed is outdated. The web site shows more recent articles than the feed does. Besides of that: Thank you for this really handy service! Regards, Stefan -- You received this message because you

Clojure 1.0.0 has been uploaded to Maven Central - Finally

2009-07-13 Thread Stefan Hübner
Hi all, just a quick update on the Maven bundle: it has finally been uploaded and is available for your Maven based projects as org.clojure:clojure:1.0.0:jar (groupId, artifactId, version, type). Thanks for all voters! -Stefan Hübner --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You

Re: Concerns About Pushing Clojure 1.0.0 to Maven Central Repo?

2009-06-02 Thread Stefan Hübner
Christian Vest Hansen writes: > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Stefan Hübner > wrote: >> >> I've submitted the Maven bundle for Clojure 1.0.0 to >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-2464. Processing the request >> might take a couple of days. &

Re: Concerns About Pushing Clojure 1.0.0 to Maven Central Repo?

2009-06-02 Thread Stefan Hübner
The upload bundle, which is found at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-2464, promotes Clojure as "org.clojure:clojure:1.0.0". It hasn't received any atention from the Upload team yet, but I do hope it gets uploaded within the next weeks. Maybe voting could speed it up... dysinger write

Patch to update pom-template.xml to reflect changed artifactId

2009-05-19 Thread Stefan Hübner
Hi, I'd like to contribute a patch to pom-template.xml that reflects - the changed artifactId ("clojure-lang" -> "clojure") and - added scm-section. This patch is meant to be applied both to branches/1.0 and t

Re: Concerns About Pushing Clojure 1.0.0 to Maven Central Repo?

2009-05-17 Thread Stefan Hübner
ojure clojure 1.0.0 org.clojure clojure 1.0.0 slim I'll submit patches to reflect the changed POM. Thank you all for your support! Stefan Hübner --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Concerns About Pushing Clojure 1.0.0 to Maven Central Repo?

2009-05-15 Thread Stefan Hübner
thank you for your clarifaction! I'll prepare the bundle then. -Stefan Rich Hickey writes: > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Laurent PETIT > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> It seems that it's really a matter of convention, I don't see any technical >> problem of having a groupId of org.clojure and a

Re: Concerns About Pushing Clojure 1.0.0 to Maven Central Repo?

2009-05-12 Thread Stefan Hübner
Daniel Renfer writes: > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: >> >> It's the answer to why the main artifact is called "clojure-lang" not >> just "clojure".  It's do differentiate Rich's framework, >> "clojure-lang", from the Contrib librarys ("clojure-contrib") even >> thou

Re: Concerns About Pushing Clojure 1.0.0 to Maven Central Repo?

2009-05-12 Thread Stefan Hübner
Hello Laurent, thanks for the summary! I'm looking forward to the decision and hope, we can move forward soon. -Stefan Laurent PETIT writes: > Hello, > > It seems that it's really a matter of convention, I don't see any technical > problem > of having a groupId of org.clojure and an artifact

Re: Concerns About Pushing Clojure 1.0.0 to Maven Central Repo?

2009-05-12 Thread Stefan Hübner
Hi Alex, ataggart writes: > I use Maven indirectly via Ivy, so I just wanted to request that, > whatever the choice of naming, the artifact and module names should > parallel. The reason for this request is that Ivy can resolve > dependencies in maven by creating URLs from a pattern. For exam

Re: Concerns About Pushing Clojure 1.0.0 to Maven Central Repo?

2009-05-11 Thread Stefan Hübner
On 10 Mai, 22:17, d...@kronkltd.net (Daniel E. Renfer) wrote: > Phil Hagelberg writes: > > Howard Lewis Ship writes: > > >> clojure-lang because there will be a clojure-contrib artifact for the > >> same group. > > > And this is ... a bad thing? I'm lost. > > > -Phil > > Good, at least I'm not t

Re: Concerns About Pushing Clojure 1.0.0 to Maven Central Repo?

2009-05-09 Thread Stefan Hübner
On 8 Mai, 01:39, Laurent PETIT wrote: > note that clojure must be compatible with JDK 1.5, so if you compile with > 1.6, maybe you should verify the compatibility mode (not sure if what I > write here makes sense, I'm not a specialist in javac retrocompatibility > concerns). Thanks for the tip!

Re: Concerns About Pushing Clojure 1.0.0 to Maven Central Repo?

2009-05-09 Thread Stefan Hübner
On 9 Mai, 17:08, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > clojure-lang because there will be a clojure-contrib artifact for the > same group. It didn't occur to me yet, that having clojure-contrib in the same group would render "org.clojure:clojure" a bad choice as groupId:artifactId for clojure itself. Does

Re: Concerns About Pushing Clojure 1.0.0 to Maven Central Repo?

2009-05-07 Thread Stefan Hübner
Laurent PETIT writes: > I also think it makes sense to deposit the whole "battery" : > clojureXX.jar > clojure-slimXX.jar > clojure-sourcesXX.jar Since clojure-slim is not bundled in the distributed ZIP for 1.0.0, I'm going the build all three libraries from SVN tag "1.0" (r1365). I've figured

Re: Concerns About Pushing Clojure 1.0.0 to Maven Central Repo?

2009-05-07 Thread Stefan Hübner
Christian Vest Hansen writes: > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:47 PM, J. McConnell wrote: >> >>> I guess only Rich can make the choice: statu quo, clojure (breaks >>> maven artifact id), clojure-lang (breaks build.xml). >> >> Not that I have a strong stake in this, but I'd vote for going with >> "clo

Re: Concerns About Pushing Clojure 1.0.0 to Maven Central Repo?

2009-05-07 Thread Stefan Hübner
Laurent PETIT writes: > You're right, so from the beginning the ant script creates > "clojure..." while the maven script creates "clojure-lang...". To be precise here, there's no such maven script that creates "clojure-lang", neither does Maven do anything during Clojure's build process. The po

Re: Concerns About Pushing Clojure 1.0.0 to Maven Central Repo?

2009-05-07 Thread Stefan Hübner
Laurent PETIT writes: > Seems fine to me. > > One question, though: I see that you want to name the artifact > "clojure-lang" and not just "clojure". > Why not just "clojure" as is the case for the ant build script ? > > I guess this could just confuse people ? Very good point! That's exactly t

Re: Concerns About Pushing Clojure 1.0.0 to Maven Central Repo?

2009-05-07 Thread Stefan Hübner
declared: org.clojure clojure-lang 1.0.0 slim -Stefan Laurent PETIT writes: > 2009/5/7 Stefan Hübner : >> >> Laurent PETIT writes: >> >>> I also think it makes sense to deposit the whole "battery" : >>> clojureXX.jar >>> clojure

Re: Concerns About Pushing Clojure 1.0.0 to Maven Central Repo?

2009-05-07 Thread Stefan Hübner
Laurent PETIT writes: > I also think it makes sense to deposit the whole "battery" : > clojureXX.jar > clojure-slimXX.jar OK, I would bundle clojure-slim.jar too. I'm not familiar with it, though curious. Would you enlighten me by throwing some light on it's purpose? > clojure-sourcesXX.jar W

Concerns About Pushing Clojure 1.0.0 to Maven Central Repo?

2009-05-06 Thread Stefan Hübner
Hi all, Since Clojure now has a stable 1.0.0 I would like to take a step forward and push it to Maven's Central Repo at http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/. This would allow people using Maven to integrate Clojure more easily, since no 3rd party repo wouldn't be involved anymore. I'm going to follow