Re: Fully lazy sequences are here!

2009-02-18 Thread Stefan Rusek
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 18, 12:20 pm, Frantisek Sodomka fsodo...@gmail.com wrote: How should I say it... It just didn't look symmetrical to me. So, basically, there is a difference between functions returning sequences - depending on

Re: Clojure on CLR/DLR

2009-02-17 Thread Stefan Rusek
is that Xronos is released under the BSD license instead of the Eclipse Public License. --Stefan Rusek --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Clojure group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com

Re: Fully lazy sequences are coming - feedback wanted!

2009-02-15 Thread Stefan Rusek
At first I found this kind of confusing, but after reading Chouser's article and the help. It makes a lot of sense. I found it easiest to understand when I thought about it as two pairs of related names. The first/rest pair and the seq/more pair.

Strings as functions of maps

2008-12-11 Thread Stefan Rusek
If we have the following map: (def m {:key 1 'sym 2 str 3}) The following are equivalent: (:key m) (m :key) As are the following: ('sym m) (m 'sym) I think the commutativity of maps with symbols and keywords is a valuable and good thing. I realize that the String class doesn't implement the