Re: Anyone on Google+ yet?

2011-07-15 Thread Toni Batchelli
https://plus.google.com/tbatchelli I can't create one for disclojure yet. Support for Organizations "coming soon", or so it seems. Toni. On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Jeremy Heiler wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Sergey Didenko > wrote: >> Well, if you are going to spam, I guess

Re: Anyone on Google+ yet?

2011-07-15 Thread Toni Batchelli
sorry, should be http://profiles.google.com/tbatchelli On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Toni Batchelli wrote: > https://plus.google.com/tbatchelli > > I can't create one for disclojure yet. Support for Organizations > "coming soon", or so it seems. > > Toni. &g

Re: Conj arrivals and Thursday night...

2010-10-18 Thread Toni Batchelli
I'll be in by 7pm or so. I am down for coding and coffee, or drinks and no coding, or what the hell, drinks and coding, but then no git commits... Toni. On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Andrew Gwozdziewycz wrote: > Hey Conj goers, > > I'm scheduled to arrive around 6:30, and after I check in am

Re: Blogs/Twitter accounts about Clojure

2010-09-04 Thread Toni Batchelli
Shameless plug: You should checkout disclojure.org and maybe subscribe to the RSS feeds. Every day I publish a list of the most relevant tweets of the day that relate to Clojure, usually with a brief summary or some comment. You might also discover awesome clojure bloggers and tweeters there. Toni

Re: Implementing a protocol with using a base implementation?

2010-08-20 Thread Toni Batchelli
record "hello" "Elapsed time: 6.257 msecs" "Elapsed time: 35.18 msecs" "Elapsed time: 5.674 msecs" "Elapsed time: 2.615 msecs" "Elapsed time: 3.372 msecs" "Elapsed time: 5.169 msecs" "Elapsed time: 3.651 msecs" &qu

Re: Implementing a protocol with using a base implementation?

2010-07-21 Thread Toni Batchelli
Hi Meikel, This is awesome! You just did a big chunk of what I was about to try to do :). Sorry for the late response, I've been off the grid for a few days... With your second proposed solution, the defrecord-with-defaults macro, one can achieve very good performance while keeping some of the f

Re: Implementing a protocol with using a base implementation?

2010-07-16 Thread Toni Batchelli
Hi Nicolas, I get the idea, but I don't see how this would help provide a default implementation for the functions inside a protocol. It looks to me like this would be the same as creating a record with only some of the functions implemented. Or am I reading it wrong? Thanks for your input. Toni

Re: Databases for a Concurrent World

2010-07-10 Thread Toni Batchelli
I think what you're doing is great. I understand you're using ab for these tests, right? What are the actual settings that you are using? Also, I'd like to mention that what these tests are showing is the behavior of the server under constant load (constant frequency in the arrival times of the re