ax2groin ax2gr...@gmail.com writes:
This code doesn't return the value I intuitively expect:
user= (not= 1 2 1)
true
When I write that, I was expecting the equivalent of (and (= 1 2) (= 1
1)), but the macro expansion is essentially (not (= 1 2 1)).
If you were expecting (not (and (= 1
Nils Bertschinger nils.bertschin...@googlemail.com writes:
Hi everyone,
it appears that eval works differently when used inside a future. The
following example REPL session shows what I mean:
user (clojure-version)
1.2.0-master-SNAPSHOT
user (defn my-inc [x] (+ x 1))
#'user/my-inc
user
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Stuart Sierra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 28, 7:41 am, lpetit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The fix import action could try to resolve an unknown symbol by
first searching the symbol in one of the classpath available
namespaces, and then search for java classes
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Dimitre Liotev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vijay Lakshminarayanan wrote:
If you've got enough time to spare, I'd recommend trying out the
clojurebox that was released a few days ago. I installed it, ensured
it worked and then replicated that in my .emacs.
Once
in the diff. I used svn diff -x -w to generate the attached
diff.
Cheers
~vijay
On Nov 28, 1:19 am, Vijay Lakshminarayanan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi
I'd like to propose a change to Clojure's current try-catch syntax.
Currently the syntax is (copied from clojure.org)
(try expr* catch-clause
