Hi Boris
If there 's no port conflict, you can run multiple nginx instances without
any problem. So if you do installation by binary you needn't remove the
prior version.
If you don't want to run multiple nginx instances , you can stop the old
one and copy the configuration files to the new
Nginx-Clojure https://github.com/nginx-clojure/nginx-clojure is a Nginx
module for embedding Clojure or Java programs, typically those Ring based
handlers.
Release 0.2.3 contains four important updates
1. Fix issue - After invoking on coroutine based socket nginx worker
will exit and
3. Remote Session Store such as Redis, MemCached etc.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Toni Helenius ton...@gmail.com wrote:
Out of interest, how do people use these multiprocess server thingies like
nginx-clojure or vert.x with datomic?
On Saturday, May 31, 2014 7:57:54 PM UTC+3, Xfeep
or LVS or haproxy as the
front.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Xfeep Zhang xfe...@gmail.com wrote:
The multiprocess from nginx is quite different with some old server
implementations. Within nginx one process can handle thousands of
connections at the same time. But some old server
Nginx-Clojure is a Nginx http://nginx.org/ module for embedding Clojure
or Java programs, typically those
Ringhttps://github.com/ring-clojure/ring/blob/master/SPEC based
handlers.
The release v0.2.1 has these new features:
1. Support to close coroutine based socket from non-main thread
user (for [ b '(1 2 3) :let [a 1] ] (println a b))
is OK.
On Thursday, May 1, 2014 12:39:22 PM UTC+8, Yuri Niyazov wrote:
Hello everyone,
In Clojure 1.6:
user (doseq [:let [a 1] b '(1 2 3)] (println a b))
1 1
1 2
1 3
nil
user (for [:let [a 1] b '(1 2 3)] (println a b))
upcoming web projects.
On Friday, April 25, 2014 11:51:41 PM UTC-4, Xfeep Zhang wrote:
nginx-clojure v0.2.0 includes new features:
1. non-blocking socket based on coroutine and compatible with largely
existing java library such as apache http client, mysql jdbc drivers
2
nginx-clojure v0.2.0 includes new features:
1. non-blocking socket based on coroutine and compatible with largely
existing java library such as apache http client, mysql jdbc drivers
2. asynchronous callback API of socket for some advanced usage
3. run initialization clojure code
.
By that time jvm_workers maybe no need to be 0 .
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Xfeep Zhang easy...@163.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 12:39:57 PM UTC+8, Roberto De Ioris wrote:
i strongly suggest you to avoid the performance as a selling point,
your
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 12:39:57 PM UTC+8, Roberto De Ioris wrote:
Hi Mingli,
Thanks for your suggestion.
Nginx-Clojure is quite different from uwsgi when supports JVM.
Nginx-Clojure make JVM embed into Nginx worker process. JVM and Nginx
worker have the same
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 12:39:57 PM UTC+8, Roberto De Ioris wrote:
i strongly suggest you to avoid the performance as a selling point, your
project is cool but not for performance (and you are using a pipe to
transfer requests data from nginx to the jvm so there ipc in place too,
I have committed some update.
- org.clojure/clojure 1.4.0 -- 1.5.1
- compojure 1.1.4 -- 1.1.6
- ring 1.1.6 -- 1.2.1
- aleph 0.3.0-beta13 -- 0.3.0
- http-kit 1.3.0-alpha2 -- 2.1.16
- ring-netty-adapter 0.0.3 -- netty-ring-adapter 0.4.6
- remove testing about pure nginx which
-server-benchmarkshosted
on Github.
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 10:31:03 AM UTC+8, Xfeep Zhang wrote:
You're welcome.
I think there are several difficult phases :
(1) update the test program in
clojure-web-server-benchmarkshttps://github.com/ptaoussanis/clojure-web-server-benchmarks
(correct me if I am wrong), does
that mean, there will be many JVM process?
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 4:44:18 PM UTC+8, Xfeep Zhang wrote:
I have done the first one. The result is
HEREhttps://github.com/ptaoussanis/clojure-web-server-benchmarks(
https://github.com/ptaoussanis/clojure-web
You 're right!
ab has many limitations.
Maybe httpload , wrk, Weighttp or ABs ( several instances of AB) are
better when test client and server do not run on the same computer.
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 5:52:59 PM UTC+8, Feng Shen wrote:
Hi, nginx-clojure looks great!
A small tip: ab
, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Xfeep Zhang easy...@163.comjavascript:
wrote:
You are welcome!
Yes, you are right. One JVM instance is embed per Nginx Worker
process. The number of Nginx Workers is generally the same with the
number of CPU.
If one Worker crashs the Nginx Master
not avoid IPC cost or socket cost ! So it will use more system
handle (at least double ones) and more copy operataion between process
and maybe more memory cost.
So I think using uwsgi to integrate JVM maybe will not be so fast!
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 10:10:40 AM UTC+8, Xfeep Zhang
in comparison to nginx +
http-kit for some real world test that is not using heavy DB operations.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Xfeep Zhang easy...@163.comjavascript:
wrote:
So far I have found why nginx-clojure is slower than http-kit when 1
concurrents. (when = 1000 concurrents
:02 AM UTC+8, Julien wrote:
Impressive!
Did you run some benchmark? How does it compare to ring-jetty and http-kit?
Julien
Le jeudi 9 janvier 2014 12:42:31 UTC-3, Xfeep Zhang a écrit :
[image: Alt
text]https://github.com/xfeep/nginx-clojure/blob/master/logo.pngNginx-Clojure
is a Nginx
, January 10, 2014 8:23:02 AM UTC+8, Julien wrote:
Impressive!
Did you run some benchmark? How does it compare to ring-jetty and http-kit?
Julien
Le jeudi 9 janvier 2014 12:42:31 UTC-3, Xfeep Zhang a écrit :
[image: Alt
text]https://github.com/xfeep/nginx-clojure/blob/master/logo.pngNginx-Clojure
PM UTC+8, Xfeep Zhang wrote:
Sorry for my mistake!
1. In the static file test, the ring-jetty result is about 10
concurrents. NOT 1 concurrents (Concurrency Level: 10 in the
ab report ).
2. In the small string test, All results about three server are about 10
concurrents
If reduce worker_connections from 2 to 1024 or 128, I think nignx will
be the fastest one in this test (the max concurrent level is only 96).
On Saturday, January 5, 2013 11:52:57 PM UTC+8, Peter Taoussanis wrote:
Hi all,
Quick post to mention that I've put up some rough benchmarks
] response)
On Monday, January 13, 2014 12:10:40 PM UTC+8, Xfeep Zhang wrote:
If reduce worker_connections from 2 to 1024 or 128, I think nignx will
be the fastest one in this test (the max concurrent level is only 96).
On Saturday, January 5, 2013 11:52:57 PM UTC+8, Peter Taoussanis wrote
You are welcome.
My Github user name is xfeep.
I'm glad to join the repo. Thanks for your invitation!
On Monday, January 13, 2014 2:42:44 PM UTC+8, Peter Taoussanis wrote:
Hi Xfeep,
Thank you, I could never understand what configuration (setting) was
wrong. I do not have time to update
wrote:
Impressive!
Did you run some benchmark? How does it compare to ring-jetty and http-kit?
Julien
Le jeudi 9 janvier 2014 12:42:31 UTC-3, Xfeep Zhang a écrit :
[image: Alt
text]https://github.com/xfeep/nginx-clojure/blob/master/logo.pngNginx-Clojure
is a Nginx http://nginx.org
[image: Alt
text]https://github.com/xfeep/nginx-clojure/blob/master/logo.pngNginx-Clojure
is a Nginx http://nginx.org/ module for embedding Clojure or Java
programs, typically those
Ringhttps://github.com/ring-clojure/ring/blob/master/SPECbased handlers.
There are some core features :
26 matches
Mail list logo
