The Clojure community on G+ is another:
https://plus.google.com/communities/103410768849046117338
On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 6:19:28 PM UTC+6, Krzysztof Władyka wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> From time to time i am writing article on http://clojure.wladyka.eu/, but
> the problem is nobody know about t
Hi all,
I've looked at the Optional Self-hosting section on the ClojureScript Github
wiki. Would it be possible to have a more step-by-step set of instructions for
experimentig with self hosting OR could someone point me to a resource which
provides one?
Thanks,
Kinley
--
You received this
Hi all,
I've looked at the Option Self-hosting section section on the ClojureScript
Github wiki. Would it be possible to have a more step-by-step set of
instructions for self hosting OR could someone point me to resource which
provides one?
Thanks,
Kinley
--
You received this message becaus
Thanks Alan,
Rich is always great.
Kinley
On Wednesday, July 15, 2015 at 12:51:10 AM UTC+6, Alan Thompson wrote:
>
> Hey, I just saw this video released: https://youtu.be/VSdnJDO-xdg
>
> It is Rich, talking at JavaOne, and might be the best talk I've seen him
> deliver.
>
> Alan
>
--
You rec
Just picked up my copy today. Thank you and looking forward to working my
way through it.
Kinley
On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 12:13:52 AM UTC+6, Alex Miller wrote:
>
> The second beta of "Clojure Applied" is now available. This version adds
> Chapter 8 (Clojure Testing) as well as a foreword b
I also found clojure-doc.org accidentally, and was surprised it didn't show
up in earlier searches, especially in the context of the high quality of
the documentation.
I think merging the two resources (clojuredocs and clojure-doc) would
greatly help (I'd be happy to help in this effort), and g
@Dave Sann: Yup, I like it, it must be good sugar. I find it makes the code
much more readable.
On Tuesday, March 12, 2013 8:05:40 AM UTC+6, Dave Sann wrote:
>
> I don't see why this should be arcane.
>
> it is quite simple to understand. but yes, you do have to understand it.
> like anything.
>
I see a number of volunteers already; include me if you need any more.
+1 to the proposal to have an independent ClojureScript group.
On Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:42:22 AM UTC+6, solussd wrote:
>
> I'll help!
>
> ---
> Joseph Smith
> j...@uwcreations.com
> @solussd
>
>
> On Jan 23, 2013, at 8
Well said, Fogus, well said.
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 9:16:35 PM UTC+6, Fogus wrote:
>
> I'll just add a few points:
>
> Pull requests are not likely to happen. It's not worth fighting over.
> However, I think that is a weak excuse for not contributing. If you
> want to contribute a compl
Thanks Shantanu Kumar for your post - very informative.
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 9:18:37 PM UTC+6, Mimmo Cosenza wrote:
>
>
>
> Enlive and Hiccup seem to be popular in the Clojure community.
>
>
> I confirm that I use them on the server side. I'm now experimenting the
> corresponding enfocus
Oops, repeated posts in the middle of a connection drop. Apologies.
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 2:35:16 PM UTC+6, kinleyd wrote:
>
> I join Peter Taoussanis in congratulating and thanking Phil on this
> release. Thanks for the hard work you put in, and for making life saner for
> th
I join Peter Taoussanis in congratulating and thanking Phil on this
release. Thanks for the hard work you put in, and for making life saner for
the rest of us.
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 1:28:07 PM UTC+6, Peter Taoussanis wrote:
>
> Hey, congratulations!
>
> Thank you so much Phil and everyone
I join Peter Taoussanis in congratulating and thanking Phil on this
release. Thanks for the hard work you put in, and for making life saner for
the rest of us.
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 1:28:07 PM UTC+6, Peter Taoussanis wrote:
>
> Hey, congratulations!
>
> Thank you so much Phil and everyone
I join Peter Taoussanis in congratulating and thanking Phil on this
release. Thanks for the hard work you put in, and for making life saner for
the rest of us.
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 1:28:07 PM UTC+6, Peter Taoussanis wrote:
>
> Hey, congratulations!
>
> Thank you so much Phil and everyone
Fellow Clojurians, allow me to introduce a new Google+ Datomic Community:
https://plus.google.com/communities/109115177403359845949
If you have an interest in Datomic, please join us there. And if you've
already seen my earlier announcements on the G+ Clojure Community or on the
Google Groups D
Yes, thank you all. This was a very useful thread.
On Thursday, January 10, 2013 9:35:38 AM UTC+6, John Gabriele wrote:
>
> Thanks, all. Updated CDS basic web dev tut with this deployment info.
>
> ---John
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure"
;
> On Friday, January 4, 2013 3:30:55 AM UTC-6, kinleyd wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for taking the trouble Alex - that was pretty comprehensive. I've
>> seen Rathore's and Nolen's (both excellent), skipped Stokke's (but only
>> because Catnip didn't in
Well, thanks @dspiteself for bringing up the topic. I like the interaction
at G+ and joined the larger G+ Clojure community as a result of this thread.
On Sunday, January 6, 2013 3:51:26 AM UTC+6, dspiteself wrote:
>
> Thanks I am surprised I did not see it when I created it a week or 2 ago.
> I
Rich Hickey's talk is scheduled for week of Mar 18th but same one has
> already been released on InfoQ so not sure if they'll re-release it
> - Stuart Sierra's talk on functional design patterns is week of Apr 1st
>
> Sorry if I missed any.
>
> Alex
>
> On Thu
Oh, I should have said "Clojure presentations" at Strange Loop,
@babysnakes. Thanks for the link Konrad.
On Thursday, January 3, 2013 4:27:04 PM UTC+6, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
>
> kinleyd writes:
>
> > I've been waiting forever for the recent Strange Lo
I've been waiting forever for the recent Strange Loop Clojure talks to be
made available as well. So far I've only seen two, Amit Rathore's "Clojure
+ Datomic + Stomr = Zolodeck" and David Nolen's "ClojureScript - Better
semantics at low, low prices" on InfoQ. Any one have any idea when the
oth
@Christopher Redinger: Thanks, that's a nice page. Bookmarked and will
visit from time to time to assess the state of Clojure adoption.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note
I'm learning Clojure now and am working towards developing a web app or
desktop app. I've picked Clojure, because after learning the language I've
found it's simple, powerful, expressive and a pleasure to write. If I felt
the same way about Python or Ruby or Node, I'd pick that.
If you like Clo
It was helpful for me to start from the ground up: Got familiar with ring,
then compojure, hiccup, noir, etc. Getting familiar a library at a time
prepared me better for managing the more comprehensive frameworks when it
came time to customization. FWIW.
On Wednesday, November 14, 2012 12:20:23
Thanks Mark and Michael,
I thought I had an extensive list of Clojure resources, but quite clearly
not. :)
Kinley
On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 8:26:25 AM UTC+6, Michael Klishin wrote:
>
> 2012/11/13 Jonathon McKitrick >
>
>> - Any caveats I should be aware of running clojure on heroku?
>>
>
>
Awesome and congratulations. I look forward to picking up my copy.
On Thursday, November 8, 2012 6:23:22 AM UTC+6, Stuart Sierra wrote:
>
> Not to toot our own horn, but people have been asking about getting
> started with ClojureScript, so here's our contribution, just released in
> book form:
v0.0.7 (an updated to the first release) was released July 9, 2012. It's a
very early release of the LT Playground. Chris Granger mentioned a target
of sometime next year for a stable release.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post
It's looking good. Really look forward to version 1.0. :)
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 7:27:26 AM UTC+6, Chris Granger wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> In case you missed it via other channels, the Light Table Playground
> can now hook into your own projects!
>
> http://www.chris-granger.com/2012/07/09/l
28 matches
Mail list logo