Great! Thanks for your reply, it turned out I had a bug somewhere in
my code and I was bleeding send-offs.
On Jun 5, 12:06 am, Tassilo Horn tass...@member.fsf.org wrote:
mifrai fraim...@gmail.com writes:
Hi!
I noticed that there's a send-off in the dosync clause of ants.clj
Does send
This is probably a dumb question answered somewhere else, but I
couldn't find it :(
I noticed that there's a send-off in the dosync clause of ants.clj
Does send-off hold off enqueue'ing the action when a dosync fails/
repeats or do the actions keep getting added?
If it doesn't - well, ant's
Hi,
I was wondering why there was no update to update-in? But there is
an assoc to assoc-in and a get to a get-in.
- Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Clojure group.
To post to this group, send
there tends be really good reasons behind
these kinds of decisions and I'm just curious.
On Apr 29, 4:05 pm, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Because update-in can use any function to do the update.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:54 PM, mifrai fraim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering why
Rich says Git is not going to happen any time soon, great as it may
be, given the current lack of infrastructure (google code) and tools
support.
I'm curious as to why github isn't a viable alternative to google
code? Now that it has issue tracking, I don't see the advantages of
choosing
Thanks Rich!
Do you think it's worthwhile to add `not-empty?' in the core?
It just feels more natural to go:
(when (not-empty? (filter even? [1 2]))
...)
over
(when (seq (filter ..)) ..)
What do you think?
- Mike
On Feb 17, 11:43 am, Rich Hickey richhic...@gmail.com wrote:
I've merged
In the definition of dorun:
(defn dorun
When lazy sequences are produced via functions that have side
effects, any effects other than those needed to produce the first
element in the seq do not occur until the seq is consumed. dorun can
be used to force any effects. Walks through the
I know it's minor and nit-picky but so long as we're rolling out so
many breaking changes is it possible to reclaim scan and touch instead
of leaving dead functions that need an :exclude?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
