gt; http://pragprog.com/book/pb7con
>
> On 9 August 2014 at 01:54:22, rcg (randy.g...@gmail.com )
> wrote:
>
> Hello;
>
> We are looking for Clojure success stories within the US Government.
>
> If you have a success story you'd be willing to share, this m
e specific questions about our
> experience
>
> On Friday, August 8, 2014 8:54:08 PM UTC-4, rcg wrote:
>>
>> Hello;
>>
>> We are looking for Clojure success stories within the US Government.
>>
>> If you have a success story you'd be willing to
Hello;
We are looking for Clojure success stories within the US Government.
If you have a success story you'd be willing to share, this may counter or
help resolve objections to the EPL license that have been raised by
Lawyers. Our development group has had much success with Clojure.
Unfortuna
ision that bans EPL-based
> software from being used in the federal government.
>
> - James
>
>
> On 30 May 2014 04:31, rcg > wrote:
>
>> Hello;
>>
>> Developing web site for government using Clojure on back end- lawyers
>> reviewing EPL had o
n their
> right mind will give legal advice, at least not this way.
>
>
> On May 29, 2014, at 8:31 PM, rcg >
> wrote:
>
> Hello;
>
> Developing web site for government using Clojure on back end- lawyers
> reviewing EPL had objections. Would appreciate any a
that is a good point... however this lawyer's opinion seems to be holding
weight in this particular situation, just hoping to find out how others
have dealt with these sorts of objections
On Thursday, May 29, 2014 9:37:17 PM UTC-10, Zach Oakes wrote:
>
> Eclipse itself is as common as oxygen in
Hello;
Developing web site for government using Clojure on back end- lawyers
reviewing EPL had objections. Would appreciate any advice on how to deal
with them.
Again- web site, not distributing or modifying Clojure. I have no expertise
with Open Source Licenses or lawyer-ese jargon.
These ar
