Re: [ANN] 2016 State of Clojure Community Survey

On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 5:04:07 PM UTC-7, Jeaye Wilkerson wrote: > > Unfortunately, the results for some of these questions, primarily the > ranking, won't be representative of the community's actual stance. > > In this case, there's an easy fix. Anyone who has 'startup times w/

Re: [ANN] 2016 State of Clojure Community Survey

Time for a redo? In the future, it might be beneficial to submit the questions to the mailing list first, in hopes of ruling out more of these ambiguities and misinterpretations. Unfortunately, the results for some of these questions, primarily the ranking, won't be representative of the

Re: [ANN] 2016 State of Clojure Community Survey

Should've been a separate question for choice of rank order... :-) On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Colin Yates wrote: > Oh the joys of a lack of a ubiquitous language :-). I was only > surprised it didn't start at 0 ;-). > > On 13 December 2016 at 15:46, Jose Figueroa

Re: [ANN] 2016 State of Clojure Community Survey

Oh the joys of a lack of a ubiquitous language :-). I was only surprised it didn't start at 0 ;-). On 13 December 2016 at 15:46, Jose Figueroa Martinez wrote: > Me too :-| > > > El martes, 13 de diciembre de 2016, 2:44:08 (UTC-6), Patrick Kristiansen > escribió: >> >> On

Re: [ANN] 2016 State of Clojure Community Survey

Me too :-| El martes, 13 de diciembre de 2016, 2:44:08 (UTC-6), Patrick Kristiansen escribió: > > On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 2:00:10 AM UTC+1, Mike Rodriguez wrote: >> >> Uh oh. I should have asked. I ranked my priorities in the exact opposite >> order since I thought 1 was lowest. > > >

Re: [ANN] 2016 State of Clojure Community Survey

On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 2:00:10 AM UTC+1, Mike Rodriguez wrote: > > Uh oh. I should have asked. I ranked my priorities in the exact opposite > order since I thought 1 was lowest. I did too. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group.

Re: [ANN] 2016 State of Clojure Community Survey

Uh oh. I should have asked. I ranked my priorities in the exact opposite order since I thought 1 was lowest. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new

Re: [ANN] 2016 State of Clojure Community Survey

Highest On Monday, December 12, 2016 at 9:58:35 AM UTC-6, Matthaus Owens wrote: > > In priority ranking, is 1 highest or lowest priority? > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 06:43 Alex Miller wrote: > >> It's time for the annual State of Clojure Community survey! >> >> If you are a

Re: [ANN] 2016 State of Clojure Community Survey

In priority ranking, is 1 highest or lowest priority? On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 06:43 Alex Miller wrote: > It's time for the annual State of Clojure Community survey! > > If you are a user of Clojure, ClojureScript, or ClojureCLR, we are greatly > interested in your responses

Re: [ANN] 2016 State of Clojure Community Survey

Yeah, that was not intended, however I can't modify it now that we've started collecting responses (I would have to delete and re-add the question). On Monday, December 12, 2016 at 8:51:31 AM UTC-6, James Reeves wrote: > > The question "What industry or industries do you develop for?" only

Re: [ANN] 2016 State of Clojure Community Survey

The question "What industry or industries do you develop for?" only allows one option to be picked, but the question implies that you should be able to choose multiple options. - James On 12 December 2016 at 14:43, Alex Miller wrote: > It's time for the annual State of

[ANN] 2016 State of Clojure Community Survey

It's time for the annual State of Clojure Community survey! If you are a user of Clojure, ClojureScript, or ClojureCLR, we are greatly interested in your responses to the following survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/clojure2016 The survey contains four pages: 1. General questions