Re: [ANN] BigBang v0.1.1 - compose stuartsierra.component/system-update(s) in start invocation time

2014-12-12 Thread JUAN ANTONIO Ruz
and about ..."something that's hard to do with just Component, and easy to do with BigBang" in my last example https://github.com/milesian/bigbang-example/blob/master/src/bigbang_example/core.clj#L60-L64 I could use 3 different library update-system actions in a specific start sequence (highlig

Re: [ANN] BigBang v0.1.1 - compose stuartsierra.component/system-update(s) in start invocation time

2014-12-12 Thread JUAN ANTONIO Ruz
Hi James! You're right I wrote a lot about the relation between "component definition", "update-system fn" and "system customization" but very little about BigBang... Basically with the minimal code provided (only 11L

Re: [ANN] BigBang v0.1.1 - compose stuartsierra.component/system-update(s) in start invocation time

2014-12-11 Thread James Reeves
I've read through the README, but I still don't feel like I understand what problem this library is trying to solve. Could you perhaps provide an example of something that's hard to do with just Component, and easy to do with BigBang? - James On 11 December 2014 at 17:31, JUAN ANTONIO Ruz wrote

[ANN] BigBang v0.1.1 - compose stuartsierra.component/system-update(s) in start invocation time

2014-12-11 Thread JUAN ANTONIO Ruz
Hi folks, I wanted to share here BigBang, my library proposal in customization the way stuartsierra/component system starts. I'll copy here "*Why did I write this library*?" After trying to get working Aspect Oriented Programming and Reverse Dependency Injection in stuartuartsierra/component