Sure, you can write code in CPS style by hand. Javascript developers do it
all the time. But it's a very tedius, mechanical transformation. And
tedius, mechanical transformations are what Lisps excel at ;-)
We could also ask why we would want (reified) continuations? From a
theoretical point o
Hi, Nathan
Would you like to describe shortly, why one would need such transformation.
What are the benefits and what prevents to write code in CPS style by hand?
p.s. sorry, I'm far from being expert in this field :)
четверг, 19 февраля 2015 г., 23:45:10 UTC+6 пользователь Nathan Davis
написал
Dear Fellow Clojurians,
I'm pleased to annouce release 0.1.0 of pulley.cps, a tool for transforming
Clojure code into Continuation-Passing-Style. You can find it at
http://github.com/positronic-solutions/pulley.cps.
While this is not the first attempt at such a tool, to the best of my
know
