These are both awesome libraries, thanks Ben and Juan, expound can also be
a nice addition for unravel (the unrepl client). Inspectable would be
awesome for an "upgraded" repl (it is already there as :caught handler,
very nice).
On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 at 4:16:44 PM UTC-7, Ben Brinckerhoff wr
This looks superb, Ben, thanks for the awesome work.
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 04:16:44PM -0700, Ben Brinckerhoff wrote:
> Expound formats clojure.spec errors in a way that is optimized for humans
> to read. Expound works in Clojure and Clojurescript.
>
> This release provides human-optimized erro
That was a great description Ben! So agree with everything there.
One important difference is that inspectable doesn't support clojurescript
yet, since it's using a swing interface to draw the ui I'm trying to figure
out the best way to support it.
My idea on inspectable is putting there a bunc
Please keep in mind that I have not yet used Inspectable, but my impression
from reading the README is they both help developers understand
spec-related failures.
Inspectable does this by providing rich, interactive UI that allows
developers to explore the specifics of a spec failure at the REP
inspectable was recently announced in this group as well. Do you know what
the similarities and differences are between these projects?
Andy
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Ben Brinckerhoff
wrote:
> Expound formats clojure.spec errors in a way that is optimized for humans
> to read. Expound w
Expound formats clojure.spec errors in a way that is optimized for humans
to read. Expound works in Clojure and Clojurescript.
This release provides human-optimized error messages when using a number of
spec features, including instrumentation and `assert`.
More information is available in the
