Re: [ClojureScript] Re: [ANN] cuerdas 0.1.0: A string manipulation library for clojure and clojurescript.

2014-12-24 Thread Andrey Antukh
Hi! Thank you very much! You are right about nil handling, it should be documented and proper handled. But I'm not completely convinced with ruby behavior for that, in many other implementations in other languages it is slightly different. In my opinion that is more proper behavior: blank?

Re: [ClojureScript] Re: [ANN] cuerdas 0.1.0: A string manipulation library for clojure and clojurescript.

2014-12-24 Thread Erik Price
Note that there is precedent for this in clojure.string/blank? http://clojuredocs.org/clojure.string/blank_q. ​ On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Andrey Antukh n...@niwi.be wrote: Hi! Thank you very much! You are right about nil handling, it should be documented and proper handled. But