Often compatibility comes at the cost of functionality and maintainability,
so in the end of the day someone has to pay the piper. Why would anyone be
using Emacs 23? It's easy to upgrade it pretty much everywhere and I doubt
anyone is doing much programming on their RHEL 5/6 production servers.
O
Hooray for compatibility in general. Let us always remember the less
fortunate. (Ehem - users of Emacs 23 for example.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts fr
Btw, what's the point of maintaining compatibility with 1.3? According to
the last state of Clojure survey pretty much no one uses 1.3 and 1.4 and
the upgrade path to 1.5 is not exactly hard...
On 20 June 2015 at 16:32, Magnar Sveen wrote:
> Thanks! Have been waiting for this. Working with .cljc
Thanks! Have been waiting for this. Working with .cljc-files is quite nice
after these changes. :)
On Friday, June 19, 2015 at 9:46:08 PM UTC+2, Stuart Sierra wrote:
>
> tools.namespace: parse namespace declarations and reload
> files in dependency order.
>
> https://github.com/clojure/tools.name
tools.namespace: parse namespace declarations and reload
files in dependency order.
https://github.com/clojure/tools.namespace
Release 0.2.11 contains the following changes:
* [TNS-34] Support for reader conditionals
tools.namespace still works only in Clojure(JVM), not
ClojureScript. But it
