I've noticed that the "+" character can be used in namespaces without seeming to cause any issues, e.g.
(ns app.view.posts+comments) This also appears to work fine when there is AOT compilation, with the symbol being munged in the same way a function name would be. Is it a good idea to create a namespace like this? If namespaces are allowed all the characters of a symbol, then the EDN spec would suggest this is a permitted namespace name. However, I haven't seen this style of namespace before. >From a purely aesthetic standpoint, "posts+comments" seems a nice way of denoting the name of a composite view. - James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en