> +1 for a Clojure port of Iterate; it's a fantastic library.
I believe it's also completely specified, which is not the case for
LOOP. LOOP is a little like English in that regard... very powerful,
but time flies like an arrow, and fruit flies like a banana!
--~--~-~--~~
>> Heh, I've always wanted one of these. Anyways, I think that instead of
>> emulating loop , you should try to somewhat emulate iterate.
>> http://common-lisp.net/project/iterate/
>
> Good point! I only used Iterate a couple times, and now I'm reading up
> more seriously on it... I think I can ke
at has done it, but then again
> i'm not really on top of things.
>
> http://common-lisp.net/project/iterate/
>
> On Sep 7, 6:59 am, Tayssir John Gabbour
> wrote:
>
> > Hi!
>
> > Is anyone else working on a Common Lisp style "loop"? I'd hate to
e? I don't know.
Looks great, btw. I don't know anyone that has done it, but then again
i'm not really on top of things.
http://common-lisp.net/project/iterate/
On Sep 7, 6:59 am, Tayssir John Gabbour
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is anyone else working on a Common Lisp style &quo
Hi!
Is anyone else working on a Common Lisp style "loop"? I'd hate to
duplicate effort.
I wrote one yesterday, though I still have to read that stuff on how
to decently package a lib. ;)
http://github.com/tayssir/cl-loop/tree/master
(I might not have written this, but I couldn
