I agree with you in principle, but I suspect that the answer is
deliberately delegated to Java's definition of letter or number.
Mark
On Mar 2, 3:17 am, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 March 2010 00:24, Joost jo...@zeekat.nl wrote:
On 1 mrt, 23:02, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com
While certainly legal unicode, it's a PITA with most western
keyboards. I don't recommend straying far from ASCII-128 w/o a great,
great, reason.
Of course, someone from the east may disagree.
On Mar 1, 5:24 pm, Joost jo...@zeekat.nl wrote:
On 1 mrt, 23:02, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com
According to http://clojure.org/reader, “Symbols begin with a non-
numeric character and can contain alphanumeric characters and *, +, !,
-, _, and ? (other characters will be allowed eventually, but not all
macro characters have been determined).” Are there any plans of
allowing any more symbol
On 1 March 2010 23:23, joshua-choi rbysam...@gmail.com wrote:
According to http://clojure.org/reader, Symbols begin with a non-
numeric character and can contain alphanumeric characters and *, +, !,
-, _, and ? (other characters will be allowed eventually, but not all
macro characters have
On 1 mrt, 23:02, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know if the following's allowed, but it works:
user= (def ð Math/PI)
#'user/ð
user= ð
3.141592653589793
Sine the JVM considers all strings to be 16-bit unicode, I would
expect all the usual java/unicode number/letter types to
