It seems hard to answer in a completely generic fashion. If there's a
certain collection of vectors which you'd like to share structure, it
may be possible to put a number on the degree of sharing achieved by
examining the internals of those vectors. That wouldn't address the
issue of intermediate
On 12 August 2014 at 13:49:42, Linus Ericsson (oscarlinuserics...@gmail.com)
wrote:
The conclusion of this is I think the easiest way to make this work is to just
run the algorithm in both versions and watch the object allocation statistics
closely in VisualVM or similar.
Yeah, that's exactly
You could likely use System/identityHashCode to count the similarity of
objects all the objects.
I created a small function that only honors the "clojure-visible"
structure, and exposes every item in a tree structure (apart from the
arrays in PersistentVectors and some PersistentMaps)
(defn steam
Is there any way to benchmark the degree of structural sharing achieved by a
Clojure algorithm? I'm evaluating two different implementations of an
algorithm, one which uses zippers and one which uses rrb-vector. It would be
great if there were some way to quantify the degree to which they both a